Descriptor
| Adults | 1 |
| Armed Forces | 1 |
| Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Males | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Military Personnel | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Predictive Measurement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Author
| Dunlap, William P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDunlap, William P.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
The reliability of derived measures from 4 cognitive paradigms was studied using 19 Navy enlisted men (aged between 18 and 24 years). The paradigms were: graphemic and phonemic analysis; semantic memory retrieval; lexical decision making; and letter classification. Results indicate that derived scores may have low reliability. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Armed Forces, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
