NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gentry, Marcia; Desmet, Ophélie Allyssa; Karami, Sareh; Lee, Hyeseong; Green, Corinne; Cress, Alissa; Chowkase, Aakash; Gray, Anne – Roeper Review, 2021
In this article, we reviewed how intelligence tests were developed and normed, with a careful eye to underserved groups. Based on state recommendations, five group-administered and five individually-administered tests were reviewed for demographics; invariance testing; validity and reliability reporting; and gifted identification suitability. We…
Descriptors: Gifted Education, High Stakes Tests, Ability Identification, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Naglieri, Jack A.; Ford, Donna Y. – Roeper Review, 2015
Black and Hispanic students are undeniably underidentified as gifted and underrepresented in gifted education. The underrepresentation of the two largest groups of "minority" students is long-standing, dating several decades, and is a serious area of contention. Most debates focus on the efficacy of traditional intelligence tests with…
Descriptors: Misconceptions, Nonverbal Ability, Ability, Ability Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goerss, Jean; Amend, Edward R.; Webb, James T.; Webb, Nadia; Beljan, Paul – Roeper Review, 2006
The Hartnett, Nelson, and Rinn 2004 study indicates that diagnostic confusion between ADD/ADHD and giftedness exists, and that research on medication practices is warranted. Mika disagrees, saying that there is no empirical evidence of misdiagnosis of gifted children as having ADD/ADHD. We disagree with Mika's logic, and describe evidence that…
Descriptors: Evidence, Gifted, Reader Response, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spangler, Robert S.; Sabatino, David A. – Roeper Review, 1995
The longitudinal stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised was examined for consistency in determining eligibility for gifted programs among 66 elementary children. All subtest scales except one remained extremely stable, producing less than one scale score point difference across three test administrations. Children…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Eligibility, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trentham, Landa L.; Hall, Eleanor G. – Roeper Review, 1987
When teachers' ratings of first- through tenth-graders (N=160) on the Gifted Student Screening Scale (GSSS) were compared with students' scores on various intelligence tests, the GSSS identified 35 of 37 previously-identified cognitively-gifted students, with 59 students (not previously identified as gifted) identified for further screening for…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaufman, Alan S. – Roeper Review, 1992
This assessment of the usefulness of the "Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised" and the "Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition" for gifted children found that both are technically superior instruments with sensitive items, exceptional standardization, strong construct validity, and…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Moore, Sara Delano – Roeper Review, 1993
This review of the Screening Assessment for Gifted Elementary Students (SAGES) and the Screening Assessment for Gifted Elementary Students-Primary (SAGES-P) looks at test content, utility, and technical considerations. The tests are commended for their provision of gifted norms. Some reservations about the tests' validity and reliability data are…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Gifted, Norm Referenced Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fishkin, Anne S.; And Others – Roeper Review, 1996
This study investigated patterns of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Third Edition subtest scores for 42 gifted children in grades 4-8. Variability from subtest means was highest on Similarities, Comprehension, Coding, and Symbol Search subtests. Significant weaknesses were found on the Block Design subtest, seen as a peak subtest…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cluster Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fishkin, Anne S.; Johnson, Aileen S. – Roeper Review, 1998
This article examines assessment instruments, measurement considerations, and factors that affect understanding of a child's creativity. It compares strengths and weaknesses of methods of assessing creativity and lists more than 60 standardized assessment measures. Procedures for using formal and informal measures in the decision-making process…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Children, Creativity, Divergent Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Matthews, Dona J. – Roeper Review, 1988
The efficacy of Raven's Matrices in the gifted identification process is reviewed, focusing on their reliability, validity, and fairness and comparing them with other intelligence tests. It is concluded that, despite problems with narrowness of scope and standardization practices, these tests provide a useful screening device for intellectually…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cahan, Sorel; Gejman, Alicia – Roeper Review, 1993
The constancy of intelligence quotients (IQs) of 161 gifted Israeli children, obtained initially in grades K-4 and retested 1-4 years later, was examined. Results indicated that 86% still qualified as gifted on the retest, with mean differences of five to eight IQ points. Performance scores tended to remain constant, whereas verbal scores tended…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Foreign Countries, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baer, John – Roeper Review, 1994
Two studies are reported that measure the long-term stability of performance assessments involving story-writing and poetry-writing (involving grade four and five students) and story-telling (involving grade two students). The long-term stability of these assessments compares favorably with stability figures for other creativity tests. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Tests, Elementary Education