Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Test Reliability | 6 |
| Intelligence Tests | 4 |
| Test Bias | 4 |
| Academic Achievement | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Intelligence | 2 |
| Tests | 2 |
| Academic Aptitude | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Background | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Forum | 6 |
Author
| Vandivier, Phillip L. | 2 |
| Vandivier, Stella Sue | 2 |
| Apstein, Barbara | 1 |
| Charland, Julie | 1 |
| Lippmann, Walter | 1 |
| Simon, Marielle | 1 |
| Terman, Lewis M. | 1 |
| Tierney, Robin D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 2 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tierney, Robin D.; Simon, Marielle; Charland, Julie – Educational Forum, 2011
Knowing that grades can have long-term consequences for students, teachers voice concern about being fair in the grading process. However, their interpretations of fairness are varied and sometimes contradictory. This study looked at how teachers in one standards-based educational system determined secondary students' grades, focusing specifically…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Academic Achievement, Grading, Educational Principles
Peer reviewedLippmann, Walter – Educational Forum, 1986
The author answers Terman's allegations. He states that, while he honestly thinks that there is a considerable future for mental testing, it is also a field that could be dangerous if the people in positions of leadership are "loose-minded." (CT)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Bias, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedTerman, Lewis M. – Educational Forum, 1986
Examines a few samples of Walter Lippmann's allegations concerning the validity of intelligence tests. (CT)
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Test Bias, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedApstein, Barbara – Educational Forum, 1975
Article suggested that students must learn through experience to think for themselves and that the College Level Examination Program cannot substitute for that experience. (RK)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, College Credits, Critical Thinking, Discussion
Peer reviewedVandivier, Phillip L.; Vandivier, Stella Sue – Educational Forum, 1979
Discusses the most widely used individual intelligence tests: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M). Covers what the tests measure; psychometric or technical properties of the tests; and how test results are used. (JOW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Aptitude, Background, Disadvantaged Youth
Peer reviewedVandivier, Phillip L.; Vandivier, Stella Sue – Educational Forum, 1979
Arguments and prejudices against the use of individually administered intelligence tests are considered and compared with possible values that may be obtained. Cautions about test score interpretation are discussed. Implications of abolishing intelligence testing are considered and recommendations for effective testing policies are presented. (CTM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence

Direct link
