Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
| College Board | 2 |
| Accounting Education | 1 |
| College Student Journal | 1 |
| Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
| Numeracy | 1 |
Author
| Boylan, Daniel | 1 |
| Check, John F. | 1 |
| Hendrickson, Amy | 1 |
| HyeSun Lee | 1 |
| Jonick, Christine | 1 |
| Jun Xu | 1 |
| Katrina C. Roohr | 1 |
| Kim, Rachel | 1 |
| Kobrin, Jennifer L. | 1 |
| Melican, Gerald | 1 |
| Ou Lydia Liu | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Non-Print Media | 2 |
| Reference Materials - General | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 4 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jonick, Christine; Schneider, Jennifer; Boylan, Daniel – Accounting Education, 2017
The purpose of the research is to examine the effect of different response formats on student performance on introductory accounting exam questions. The study analyzes 1104 accounting students' responses to quantitative questions presented in two formats: multiple-choice and fill-in. Findings indicate that response format impacts student…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Accounting, Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests
Katrina C. Roohr; HyeSun Lee; Jun Xu; Ou Lydia Liu; Zhen Wang – Numeracy, 2017
Quantitative literacy has been identified as an important student learning outcome (SLO) by both the higher education and workforce communities. This paper aims to provide preliminary evidence of the psychometric quality of the pilot forms for "HEIghten" quantitative literacy, a next-generation SLO assessment for students in higher…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Numeracy, Test Items, Item Analysis
Kobrin, Jennifer L.; Kim, Rachel; Sackett, Paul – College Board, 2011
There is much debate on the merits and pitfalls of standardized tests for college admission, with questions regarding the format (multiple-choice versus constructed response), cognitive complexity, and content of these assessments (achievement versus aptitude) at the forefront of the discussion. This study addressed these questions by…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Mathematics Tests, Test Items, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedCheck, John F. – College Student Journal, 1982
Surveyed student attitudes on modes of testing and evaluation. Data from 476 college students revealed that multiple-choice test items and short answer essays were most preferred. Found grade point average related to study habits and preparation for and determinant of student preferences regarding tests. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Students, Educational Testing, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedTrevisan, Michael S.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
The reliability and validity of multiple-choice tests were computed as a function of the number of options per item and student ability for 435 parochial high school juniors, who were administered the Washington Pre-College Test Battery. Results suggest the efficacy of the three-option item. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Distractors (Tests), Grade Point Average
Hendrickson, Amy; Patterson, Brian; Melican, Gerald – College Board, 2008
Presented at the Annual National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores how different item weighting can affect the effective weights, validity coefficents and test reliability of composite scores among test takers.
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format, Test Validity, Test Reliability

Direct link
