NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peabody, Michael R.; Wind, Stefanie A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
Setting performance standards is a judgmental process involving human opinions and values as well as technical and empirical considerations. Although all cut score decisions are by nature somewhat arbitrary, they should not be capricious. Judges selected for standard-setting panels should have the proper qualifications to make the judgments asked…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Decision Making, Performance Based Assessment, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Baldwin, Peter; Margolis, Melissa J.; Mee, Janet; Winward, Marcia – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2017
Validating performance standards is challenging and complex. Because of the difficulties associated with collecting evidence related to external criteria, validity arguments rely heavily on evidence related to internal criteria--especially evidence that expert judgments are internally consistent. Given its importance, it is somewhat surprising…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting, Cutting Scores, Expertise
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Margolis, Melissa J.; Mee, Janet; Clauser, Brian E.; Winward, Marcia; Clauser, Jerome C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2016
Evidence to support the credibility of standard setting procedures is a critical part of the validity argument for decisions made based on tests that are used for classification. One area in which there has been limited empirical study is the impact of standard setting judge selection on the resulting cut score. One important issue related to…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Credibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Çetin, Sevda; Gelbal, Selahattin – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2013
In this research, the cut score of a foundation university was re-calculated with bookmark method and with Angoff method, each of which is a standard setting method; and the cut scores found were compared with the current proficiency score. Thus, the final cut score was found to be 27.87 with the cooperative work of 17 experts through the Angoff…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiffin-Richards, Simon P.; Pant, Hans Anand; Koller, Olaf – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2013
Cut-scores were set by expert judges on assessments of reading and listening comprehension of English as a foreign language (EFL), using the bookmark standard-setting method to differentiate proficiency levels defined by the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). Assessments contained stratified item samples drawn from extensive item…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Language Tests, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Schaaf, Marieke F.; Stokking, Karel M. – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2011
Current international demands to strengthen the teaching profession have led to an increased development and use of professional content standards. The study aims to provide insight in the construct validity of content standards by researching experts' underlying assumptions and preferences when participating in a delphi method. In three rounds 21…
Descriptors: Expertise, Delphi Technique, Research Methodology, Construct Validity