NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Foley, Brett P. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2016
There is always a chance that examinees will answer multiple choice (MC) items correctly by guessing. Design choices in some modern exams have created situations where guessing at random through the full exam--rather than only for a subset of items where the examinee does not know the answer--can be an effective strategy to pass the exam. This…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Case Studies, Test Construction
Webb, Melvin W., II; Miller, Eva R. – 1995
As constructed-response items become an integral part of educational assessments, setting student performance standards on constructed-response items has become an important issue. Two standard-setting methods, one used for setting standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in reading in grade 8 and the other used to set…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Constructed Response, Criteria, Educational Assessment
Buckendahl, Chad W.; Plake, Barbara S.; Impara, James C. – 1999
Many school districts are developing assessments that incorporate both selected response and constructed response formats. Scores on these assessments can be used for a variety of purposes ranging from subject remediation to promotion decisions. These policy decisions are informed by recommendations for Minimum Passing Scores (MPSs) from standard…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Constructed Response, Cutting Scores, Educational Assessment
Hansche, Linda – 1994
Setting standards on performance measures is discussed in the context of the State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards (SCASS) initiative supported by the Council of Chief State School Offices. The usual item-based methods for standard setting, the methods developed by Nedelsky (1954), Angoff (1971), and Ebel (1972), were developed…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education
Reckase, Mark D.; And Others – 1995
The research reported in this paper was conducted to gain information to guide the selection of standard setting procedures for use with polytomous items to set achievement levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessments in U.S. History and geography. Standard-setting procedures were evaluated to determine the relative…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peyser, James A. – Education Next, 2006
There can be little doubt that there is wide variation in the rigor and quality of state standards and assessments. Moreover, it is clear that the vast majority of states have set their academic achievement bar far lower than federal standards, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Since No Child Left Behind (NCLB)…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Test Results, State Standards, Grants
Hambleton, Ronald K. – 1993
A review of educational measurement journals indicates that the decade of the 1970s and up until about 1984 was the time when substantial numbers of studies dealt with criterion-referenced measurement, and the era in which criterion-referenced measurement advances were made. Although there appears to be less interest in publications today, a…
Descriptors: Content Validity, Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making, Diagnostic Tests