NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kunz, Tanja; Meitinger, Katharina – Field Methods, 2022
Although list-style open-ended questions generally help us gain deeper insights into respondents' thoughts, opinions, and behaviors, the quality of responses is often compromised. We tested a dynamic and a follow-up design to motivate respondents to give higher quality responses than with a static design, but without overburdening them. Our…
Descriptors: Online Surveys, Item Response Theory, Test Items, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brenner, Philip S.; Bulgar-Medina, Justine – Field Methods, 2018
Many social identities (e.g., race, ethnicity) are measured using mark-all-that-apply (MATA) questions because they allow survey respondents to account for the multiple, nonexclusive ways in which they identify themselves. We test the use of MATA measures of sexual orientation and gender identity and compare them with forced choice (FC), an…
Descriptors: Surveys, Sexual Orientation, Measurement Techniques, Homosexuality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Al Baghal, Tarek – Field Methods, 2017
Prior studies suggest memories are potentially error prone. Proactive dependent interviewing (PDI) is a possible method to reduce errors in reports of change in longitudinal studies, reminding respondents of previous answers while asking if there has been any change since the last survey. However, little research has been conducted on the impact…
Descriptors: Interviews, Questioning Techniques, Surveys, Language Usage