Descriptor
Source
| Learning Disabilities… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGreene, Gary – Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1999
Twenty-three elementary and middle school students with learning disabilities were taught 14 difficult-to-memorize multiplication facts with a combination of mnemonic and traditional instruction. Results indicated that mnemonic training enhanced learning and these benefits were retained over time. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Arithmetic, Elementary Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedKoscinski, Susan T.; Gast, David L. – Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1993
Six male elementary school students with learning disabilities were taught multiplication facts using a computer software program with a five-second constant time delay procedure. Results indicated that the computer-assisted instructional program was effective. Learning generalized with varying degrees of success. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Elementary Education, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewedKoscinski, Susan T.; Hoy, Cheri – Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1993
This article explains how to use constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students who have learning disabilities. Specific techniques for using time delay on an individual or small group basis are outlined, a sample student data sheet is presented, and the role of reinforcement is addressed. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Individualized Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Learning Disabilities, Mathematics Instruction


