Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Curriculum Studies | 5 |
Author
| Abbott, Lesley | 1 |
| Fenstermacher, Gary D. | 1 |
| Leander, Kevin M. | 1 |
| Marriott, Stuart | 1 |
| McGarvey, Brian | 1 |
| Morgan, Valerie | 1 |
| Osborne, Margery D. | 1 |
| Pendlebury, Shirley | 1 |
| Richardson, Virginia | 1 |
| Schwab, Joseph J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Illinois | 1 |
| United Kingdom (Northern… | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSchwab, Joseph J. – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1989
Considers the relationship between testing and curriculum by examining the testing literature. Argues that a test that is both valid and useful is not possible due to the absence of a certifiable standard in most curriculum areas. Suggests that validation could be better defined through a consideration of various factors of education. (KO)
Descriptors: Curriculum, Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education
Leander, Kevin M.; Osborne, Margery D. – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2008
We analyse two narratives of teacher-facilitator teams producing elementary science curricula and disseminating them to their peers. We draw on these stories to interpret how teacher-facilitators position themselves with respect to other educators (e.g. peer teachers and development-team members), to real and imagined students and parents, to…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Elementary School Science, Educational Change, Teacher Leadership
Peer reviewedFenstermacher, Gary D.; Richardson, Virginia – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1993
Discusses the use of Aristolean logic in developing practical reasoning and arguments. Asserts that practical arguments are used to explain why an individual took action based on practical reasoning. Contends that this approach should be used by teachers in applying research findings to instruction and in encouraging students to support their…
Descriptors: Action Research, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Structures, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMcGarvey, Brian; Marriott, Stuart; Morgan, Valerie; Abbott, Lesley – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1997
Describes how a group of primary schools in Northern Ireland plan to make the shift to a differentiated curriculum. Differentiation, in this context, refers to a broad effort to teach to individual students' abilities and needs. Concludes that although progress was made, more work needs to be done. (MJP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Curriculum Development, Educational Administration, Educational Change
Peer reviewedPendlebury, Shirley – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1993
Discusses the use of practical reasoning and practical argument techniques to improve classroom instruction. Contends that teachers may not apply the results of practical reasoning to instruction because of self-deception or intuitive beliefs. Concludes that the relationship between practical reasoning and practical arguments requires more study…
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, Classroom Techniques, Cognitive Processes, Cooperative Learning

Direct link
