Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Discussion (Teaching… | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Pharmacology | 1 |
| Physicians | 1 |
| Psychiatry | 1 |
| Teaching Methods | 1 |
| Trainees | 1 |
| Tutors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Academic Psychiatry | 1 |
Author
| Hoschl, Cyril | 1 |
| Mohr, Pavel | 1 |
| Volavka, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMohr, Pavel; Hoschl, Cyril; Volavka, Jan – Academic Psychiatry, 2012
Objective: Psychiatrists and other physicians sometimes read publications superficially, relying excessively on abstracts. The authors addressed this problem by teaching critical appraisal of individual articles. Method: The authors developed a 23-item appraisal instrument to assess articles in the area of psychopharmacology. The results were…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Voting, Physicians, Pharmacology
