Descriptor
| Dimensional Preference | 3 |
| Task Performance | 3 |
| Training | 3 |
| Attention | 2 |
| Kindergarten Children | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Conservation (Concept) | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Discrimination Learning | 1 |
| Forced Choice Technique | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Child Development | 3 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRollins, Howard; Castle, Kathryn – Child Development, 1973
These results provide a more precise attentional interpretation of both preference and pretraining effects. (Authors)
Descriptors: Attention, Cues, Dimensional Preference, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewedMedin, Douglas L. – Child Development, 1973
Study further examined the effects of forced-choice trials on dimensional preferences. (Author)
Descriptors: Dimensional Preference, Forced Choice Technique, Kindergarten Children, Measurement
Peer reviewedMiller, Patricia H. – Child Development, 1973
Results show that both kindergarten nonconservers and kindergarten conservers found height most salient. Third-grade conservers found quantity most salient but could easily attend to height and width. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Conservation (Concept), Data Analysis
