Descriptor
| Data Analysis | 3 |
| Dimensional Preference | 3 |
| Task Performance | 3 |
| Kindergarten Children | 2 |
| Responses | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Conservation (Concept) | 1 |
| Discrimination Learning | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFreeman, N. H.; Parker, D. M. – British Journal of Psychology, 1973
Results clearly show a preference for correctly classified familiar shapes over their novel counterparts. (Authors)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Classification, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference
Peer reviewedMiller, Patricia H. – Child Development, 1973
Results show that both kindergarten nonconservers and kindergarten conservers found height most salient. Third-grade conservers found quantity most salient but could easily attend to height and width. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Conservation (Concept), Data Analysis
Peer reviewedBrier, Norman; Jacobs, Paul I. – Child Development, 1972
A single administration of the reversal learning paradigm is not a sufficient basis for determining either a given subject's choice of option or his behavior on its constituent learning measures. This conclusion raises many questions about past research relating to mediation theory, since this paradigm has been the basic one employed. (Authors)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference, Discrimination Learning, Grade 2
