NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braem, Senne; Verguts, Tom; Roggeman, Chantal; Notebaert, Wim – Cognition, 2012
Both cognitive conflict (e.g. Verguts & Notebaert, 2009) and reward signals (e.g. Waszak & Pholulamdeth, 2009) have been proposed to enhance task-relevant associations. Bringing these two notions together, we predicted that reward modulates conflict-based sequential adaptations in cognitive control. This was tested combining either a single…
Descriptors: Conflict, Rewards, Cognitive Processes, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braem, Senne; Verguts, Tom; Notebaert, Wim – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011
Cognitive control is responsible for adapting information processing in order to carry out tasks more efficiently. Contrasting global versus local control accounts, it has recently been proposed that control operates in an associative fashion, that is, by binding stimulus-response associations after detection of conflict (Verguts & Notebaert,…
Descriptors: Conflict, Associative Learning, Cognitive Processes, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Notebaert, Wim; Houtman, Femke; Van Opstal, Filip; Gevers, Wim; Fias, Wim; Verguts, Tom – Cognition, 2009
It is generally assumed that slowing after errors is a cognitive control effect reflecting more careful response strategies after errors. However, clinical data are not compatible with this explanation. We therefore consider two alternative explanations, one referring to the possibility of a persisting underlying problem and one on the basis of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Research Methodology, Preschool Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Notebaert, Wim; Verguts, Tom – Cognition, 2008
Cognitive control adjusts information processing to momentary needs and task requirements. We investigated conflict adaptation when participants are performing two tasks, a Simon task and a SNARC task. The results indicated that one congruency effect (e.g., Simon) was reduced after conflict in the other task (e.g., SNARC), but only when both tasks…
Descriptors: Conflict, Cognitive Processes, Information Processing, Task Analysis