Data from a longitudinal study matching language-disordered and linguistically normal children are used to assess reading development from grade one to grade four. It is shown that good comprehenders use meaningful units more frequently than do poor comprehenders, that their reading errors are more often negligible, and that they violate syntactic…

Reports that good elementary school readers corrected more miscues than did poor readers, that poor readers relied more on graphophonemics to make corrections than did good readers, and that there were small differences between both groups' use of semantics and syntax to make corrections except as material increased in difficulty. (FL)

Aims at demonstrating the gradual automatization of subject-verb agreement operation in young writers by examining developmental changes in the occurrence of agreement errors. Finds that subjects' performance moved from systematic errors to attraction errors through an intermediate phase. Concludes that attraction errors are a byproduct of the…

This study examined the oral reading miscues of eighteen subjects, three average readers each from grades two, four, six, and eight, plus three high and three low readers from grade four. The miscues produced by each student were analyzed using the Goodman Taxonomy of Reading Miscues. Length of text was most important for low readers, who produced…

Three studies are presented, each of which is a comparison of the acquisition of an aspect of the French verb system by three groups of speakers. The speakers are: young Anglophones learning French as a second language in an early French immersion program in Montreal; young monolingual Francophones attending elementary French language schools in…