Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Compliance (Legal) | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Freedom of Speech | 2 |
| Handheld Devices | 2 |
| Photography | 2 |
| Sexual Harassment | 2 |
| Synchronous Communication | 2 |
| Telecommunications | 2 |
| Visual Aids | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Davis v Monroe County Board… | 2 |
| First Amendment | 2 |
| Bethel School District 403 v… | 1 |
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
| Fourth Amendment | 1 |
| New Jersey v TLO | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Spooner, Kallee; Vaughn, Michael – Journal of School Violence, 2016
One central controversy with youth sexting is that adolescents may be prosecuted under child pornography and obscenity statutes that were originally created to protect children from sexual exploitation perpetrated by adults and do not adequately address consensual teen behavior. Due to this concern, many states have implemented laws specifically…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Handheld Devices, Photography, Telecommunications
Brunner, Judy; Lewis, Dennis – Principal Leadership, 2010
The First Amendment does not protect a bully when it comes to vulgar or intimidating language. When the language or behavior interferes with another student's educational opportunities--whether it is done inside or outside of school--it is not protected by freedom of speech or expression, and it should be addressed by school officials.…
Descriptors: Freedom of Speech, Compliance (Legal), Educational Opportunities, Bullying

Peer reviewed
Direct link
