Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Notetaking | 2 |
| Study Skills | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Cloze Procedure | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Handwriting | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Abdullah Ali Khan | 1 |
| Heather Mahy | 1 |
| Kardash, CarolAnne M. | 1 |
| Kroeker, Tirza L. | 1 |
| Sarah Hughes | 1 |
| Sylvia Vitello | 1 |
| Victoria Crisp | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textVictoria Crisp; Sylvia Vitello; Abdullah Ali Khan; Heather Mahy; Sarah Hughes – Research Matters, 2025
This research set out to enhance our understanding of the exam techniques and types of written annotations or markings that learners may wish to use to support their thinking when taking digital multiple-choice exams. Additionally, we aimed to further explore issues around the factors that contribute to learners writing less rough work and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests, Notetaking
Peer reviewedKardash, CarolAnne M.; Kroeker, Tirza L. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1989
The effects of varying placement of a review period and test expectancy on students' notetaking, review strategies, and performance on delayed free recall, application, and cloze tests were studied for 156 undergraduates. The benefits of reviewing notes and optimal placement of the review period partly depended on the test type. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cloze Procedure, Higher Education, Learning Strategies
