Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Decoding (Reading) | 2 |
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 2 |
| Mild Intellectual Disability | 2 |
| Reading Instruction | 2 |
| Reading Skills | 2 |
| Students with Disabilities | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Moderate Intellectual… | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Saudi Arabia (Riyadh) | 1 |
| Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLinda Fälth; Heidi Selenius; Christina Sand; Idor Svensson – Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 2024
Students with intellectual disabilities need more time and explicit instruction to develop word decoding. Most previous research on interventions among these students is performed in English. Therefore, the current study examined the impact of a word-decoding intervention in Swedish on individual students with intellectual disabilities. A…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Decoding (Reading), Students with Disabilities, Mild Intellectual Disability
Aldosiry, Norah – International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2022
This study compares the effectiveness and efficiency of constant time delay (CTD) and simultaneous prompting (SP) to teach decoding and word reading to four students, 7 to 9 years of age, with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the mild to moderate range. An adapted alternating treatment design was implemented to assess the two methods. The results…
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities, Program Effectiveness, Prompting, Time
