In Braxton v. Municipal Court, the California Supreme Court upheld a Penal Code statute allowing for the summary exclusion of students from college campuses. The author discusses the need for procedural safeguards and a reevaluation of the judicial treatment of colleges and universities. (Editor)

Suggests methods by which school administrators can avoid lawsuits and can provide due process procedures within the school. (NQ)

Traces the legal arguments and decisions in "Smith vs. Robinson," which resulted in a U.S. Supreme Court decision disallowing the award of attorney's fees to successful plaintiffs claiming rights under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Notes implications of and reactions to the Supreme Court decision. (PGD)

Noting that counselors are seldom able to give legal advice or information to counselors, the author discusses those parts of the federal and state constitutions that deal with due process along with court cases that define and interpret the legal rights of students in this regard. (RP)

Author reviews court decisions that affect the schools. (Editor/CB)

The principles and objectives of the due process clause are explored and operational criteria constructed as a result of the court's decision in the Horowitz case. It is argued that the court abandoned the underlying principles in this case. (Journal availability: Fred B. Rothman & Co., 10368 W. Centennial Road, Littleton, CO 80123, $4.00.)…

Discusses the fourth amendment (providing protection against "unreasonable" searches and seizures) and its application in educational administration. (PG)

This document addresses the question of students being put into a position of double jeopardy--if they commit a civil offense, they are subject not only to trial by the public courts but are also subject to punishment by their educational institution. As a general rule, colleges and universities should not prosecute students for acts subject to…

Although a 1975 Supreme Court ruling upheld students' suspension or expulsion from school, these punishments may not apply to handicapped students, who are guaranteed a free, appropriate education under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Article discusses implications of "Honig v. Doe" (1988), a Supreme Court decision…

The NCAA has enjoyed almost total freedom from judicial scrutiny of its rules, procedures, and official acts in large part because of its private nature as an unincorporated association. The function of the NCAA, California State University, Hayward v NCAA, and due process of the student-athlete are discussed. (MLW)

It appears that university officials will be forced to recognize a student's right to privacy in a dormitory room. (PG)

Lists guidelines to help department administrators reduce their liability and strengthen their position when faced with grievances or lawsuits. (AEA)

Michael T. Rose's book, "A Prayer for Relief," examines the due process standards pertinent to the adjudication of student offenses at military academies. This article discusses the issues raised by Rose and concludes that many of his criticisms and suggestions for reform are still viable and worthy of serious attention. (LBH)

Reexamines the common law precedent on student expulsions and suspensions and seeks to formulate a comprehensive doctrinal basis for common law judicial intervention that will realistically protect the rights of public and private university students alike. (Author)