Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Conflict | 1 |
| Doctoral Programs | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Questionnaires | 1 |
| Replication (Evaluation) | 1 |
| Research Design | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Lee, Alison | 1 |
| McKenzie, Jo | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLee, Alison; McKenzie, Jo – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2011
In the context of intensifying accountability for academic work internationally, there are increasing pressures on individual supervisors, departments and universities to evaluate the quality of doctoral supervision. Existing evaluation tools are focused at departmental rather than individual level and are mostly quantitative. Evaluation for…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Graduate Students, Supervision, Doctoral Programs
