Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 4 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 19 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 47 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 109 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 106 |
| Parents | 35 |
| Teachers | 26 |
| Administrators | 22 |
| Policymakers | 16 |
| Researchers | 9 |
| Students | 5 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Community | 3 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 11 |
| Ohio | 9 |
| United Kingdom | 8 |
| Iowa | 7 |
| North Dakota | 7 |
| Texas (Houston) | 6 |
| Minnesota | 5 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 5 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 5 |
| Utah | 5 |
| Pennsylvania | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bagnato, Stephen J.; Macy, Marisa – NHSA Dialog, 2010
Authentic assessment is a growing alternative to conventional testing. This research-to-practice article describes a framework for implementing authentic assessment. The R-E-A-L framework shows how roles, equipment, assessment tools, and location can be incorporated into early childhood practices.
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Performance Based Assessment, Program Implementation, Guidelines
Peer reviewedHarrington, Robert G.; Gibson, Edward – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Results of surveying of 41 teachers who had experience with learning disability preassessment teams (intended to focus on regular classroom intervention prior to comprehensive evaluation) suggested that teachers were pleased with preassessment team members but did not agree that the teams' intervention recommendations were successful in correcting…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Intervention, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedTelzrow, Cathy F. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Preliminary research suggests that the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) may be useful in identifying a variety of special needs in preschoolers, specific language disorders, and giftedness. Additional measures (such as measures of visual motor performance) may be appropriate in conjunction with the K-ABC. (CL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disabilities, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedWhite, Margaret – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
An economical procedure for identifying the dyslexic child is described using a parent questionnaire, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (particularly noting behavioral idiosyncrasies), a brief sentence reading test, a brief spelling test, and lateralty tests. Procedures for synthesizing the evaluation information are considered.…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Dyslexia, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedFogt, Julie B.; Miller, David N.; Zirkel, Perry A. – Journal of School Psychology, 2003
This review examines published hearing/review and court decisions concerning autism eligibility in educational settings in relation to empirically supported best practices in the assessment of autism. Thirteen cases were identified for inclusion in the review. In general, results indicated that hearing/review officers and judges neither relied…
Descriptors: Autism, Disability Identification, Educational Legislation, Eligibility
Colmar, Susan; Maxwell, Amanda; Miller, Leanne – Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 2006
A number of critical issues concerning the assessment of children with intellectual disabilities, including definitional problems, psychometric factors, and practical difficulties, are raised in this article. It is suggested that school counsellors and psychologists should consider these issues when assessing children with probable or known…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Disability Identification, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedPerlmutter, Barry F.; Parus, Mildred V. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1983
Diagnostic procedures used to identify children (grades K-6) with learning disabilities in 14 school districts were studied and compared. Although some similarities existed between districts, uniformity was lacking in important areas such as test selection, extent of testing, and cutoff scores on intelligence and other tests. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities
Thurlow, Martha; Ysseldyke, James – Diagnostique, 1983
The response to a previous article by Mardell-Czednowski and Lessen notes the lack of common criteria for evaluating technical adequacy of assessment instruments used with handicapped children and stresses the need to evaluate instruments with the specific populations to which they are administered. (DB)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedSmith, Carl R. – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1985
The paper describes how the Iowa state education agency has attempted to provide leadership in defining those handicapped students who are behaviorally disordered. Emphasizes the literature base from which initial direction was taken, data-gathering activities initiated by the SEA, and subsequent policy decisions made. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Disability Identification, Policy Formation, State Departments of Education
Peer reviewedWilson, Lisa Doss; Pine, Shirley Jo – Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1985
Thirty visually impaired children (6-12 years old) were administered The Word Test which does not use visual stimulus. Correlation between age and scores and comparisons of test results for individuals with test norms indicate that The Word Test can be used in assessing language disorders among visually impaired children. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Language Handicaps, Language Tests, Multiple Disabilities
Peer reviewedGracey, Cheryl A.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Forty-nine states and the District of Columbia responded to a survey about early school screening, giving information about timing, sources of data, and content areas of screening programs. Responses indicate great variation at the state and local district levels, and confusion of screening with evaluation. Results are discussed in relation to…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education, National Surveys
Hurley, Raymond M.; Singer, Jay – Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 1985
Four unresolved issues and research needs in central auditory processing disorders in children are addressed: (1) early identification through screening; (2) relationship between test battery results and auditory behaviors; (3) relationship between test battery results and therapy planning, and (4) new assessment procedures. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Early Identification, Perceptual Handicaps, Research Needs
Measuring the Aptitude-Achievement Discrepancy in Learning Disability Diagnosis. Focus on Appraisal.
Peer reviewedReynolds, Cecil R. – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1985
The author describes his model for determining severe discrepancy in children with learning disabilities (LD). The model stresses quality of data. The author also notes that the most highly trained personnel available should evaluate potential LD children. (CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedNelson, Nickola Wolf – Topics in Language Disorders, 1986
The author reviews methods of studying individuals in context (ecological, phenomenological, and system approaches) and offers suggestions for implementing these approaches in identification, assessment, and intervention procedures for language-disordered children. (CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Intervention
Peer reviewedWillson, Victor L.; Reynolds, Cecil R. – Journal of Special Education, 1985
The paper examines three models still considered useful in identifying achievement-aptitude discrepancies: the prediction model, true score regression model, and prescore partialling model. Data are cited to provide support for the regression model as the simplest to use and most efficient statistically. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities, Models

Direct link
