Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 4 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 19 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 47 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 109 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 106 |
| Parents | 35 |
| Teachers | 26 |
| Administrators | 22 |
| Policymakers | 16 |
| Researchers | 9 |
| Students | 5 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Community | 3 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 11 |
| Ohio | 9 |
| United Kingdom | 8 |
| Iowa | 7 |
| North Dakota | 7 |
| Texas (Houston) | 6 |
| Minnesota | 5 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 5 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 5 |
| Utah | 5 |
| Pennsylvania | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLayton, Carol A.; Lock, Robin H. – Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2001
This article discusses issues in the identification of learning disabilities in students with low vision and examines the academic performance of one 8-year-old student and the methods that his multidisciplinary team used to document a dual diagnosis of low vision and learning disabilities. (Contains references.) (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities
Batsche, George M.; Kavale, Kenneth A.; Kovaleski, Joseph F. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2006
The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability--achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To address issues that have arisen about RTI, a series of…
Descriptors: Intervention, Disabilities, School Districts, Student Evaluation
Soukup, Monica; Feinstein, Sheryl – American Annals of the Deaf, 2007
The purpose of the study was to ascertain methods of identification used by teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing who were working with students with learning disabilities, the training these teachers had received, and the accommodations and modifications they had implemented for their students. A 10-item survey was designed to solicit opinions…
Descriptors: Partial Hearing, Intervention, Disability Identification, Deafness
Valus, Ann – Learning Disabilities Research, 1986
Teachers of the learning disabled (N=150) reported that major identification criteria in recent learning disability (LD) placements were intraindividual variability, achievement-potential discrepancy, below grade level academic achievement, and exclusion of other handicapping conditions. Teachers serving only LD students reported more emphasis on…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities, Special Education Teachers
Peer reviewedBoodoo, Gwyneth M. – Journal of Special Education, 1985
A multivariate model is proposed for assessing a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and actual achievement in learning disabled (LD) children. Formulas for computing universe difference score variance, the standard error of the difference score, and its generalizability coefficient are given. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Aptitude, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
PDF pending restorationCrank, Joe N.; Deshler, Donald D. – Online Submission, 2001
This article documents the eligibility procedures and student assessment result of a project for identifying university students with learning disabilities. Many legal issues are relevant in the classification of young adults with disabilities, including the use of standardized procedures for establishing disability status which are meant to…
Descriptors: Eligibility, Learning Disabilities, College Students, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedLyon, Carla S.; Ryan, Judith S. – Journal for Special Educators, 1982
Recent federal regulations implementing Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L. 94-142) have not dealt adequately with reliable identification of the handicapped child. (SB)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMcDermott, Paul A. – Journal of Special Education, 1980
To produce a greater degree of consistency and reliability in diagnosis of handicapped children, a system called multidimensional actuarial classification is presented for differential diagnosis of mental retardation, inadequate adaptive behavior, social maladjustment, academic under and overachievement, and learning disabilities. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedStanovich, Keith E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1999
Discusses how the Guckenberger v Boston University case illustrates the interaction of the psychometrics of ability differences with the concept of learning disability and with the sociopolitics of schooling and society. Urges a more inclusive definition of learning disability which abandons aptitude-achievement discrepancy requirements and a more…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Definitions, Disability Identification, Higher Education
Peer reviewedLimbos, Marjolaine M.; Geva, Esther – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
This study examined the accuracy of teacher (N=51) assessments in screening for reading disabilities among Grade 1 students of English as a second language (N=249) and as a first language (N=120). Results indicated that teacher rating scales and nominations had low sensitivity in identifying reading disability in either group as determined by a…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, English (Second Language), Primary Education, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewedSpeece, Deborah L.; Shekita, Lesley – Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 2002
A survey of 218 learning disabilities experts found only 30 percent believed IQ-reading achievement discrepancy should be a marker of reading disability. Over two thirds selected three markers: reading achievement, phonemic awareness, and treatment validity. Over 75 percent believed exclusion criteria should remain part of the definition with…
Descriptors: Definitions, Disability Identification, Eligibility, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedHeylen, Louis; Wuyts, Floris L.; Mertens, Fons; De Bodt, Marc; Pattyn, Jos; Croux, Christophe; Van de Heyning, Paul H. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1998
Voice range profiles (VRP) were analyzed according to 11 frequency, intensity, and morphological characteristics for 94 typical children and 136 children with vocal fold pathologies (ages 6-11). Normative data are presented showing marked differences between the groups. The use of the VRP Index for Children for screening is discussed. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Children, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Screening Tests
Peer reviewedMadaus, Joseph W.; Madaus, Melissa M. R. – Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2001
In the context of legal requirements that postsecondary students provide documentation of any learning disability, this article discusses components of a comprehensive learning disability evaluation at the postsecondary level with examples of actual documentation submitted to two institutions. Emphasis is on diagnosis based on multiple data…
Descriptors: College Students, Compliance (Legal), Disability Identification, Eligibility
Peer reviewedAnderson, Julie; Murphy, Norman C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Following its administration to 215 students (117 classified as regular and 98 as learning disabled), the Junior-Senior High School Personality Questionnaire (HSPQ) was reported to be useful as a differentiating diagnostic instrument, and was recommended as a screening device and as a measure of continuing progress. (JW)
Descriptors: Counselors, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Learning Disabilities
Illerbrun, David; Greenough, Pauline – Special Education in Canada, 1983
The Interactive Diagnostic Model, intended to facilitate disability interaction between teacher and clinician on behalf of the young language handicapped child, is described. Four levels of interaction are discussed: identification, diagnosis, management, and follow-up. (JW)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Communication Disorders, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis

Direct link
