Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Student Reaction | 2 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Emotional Response | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessing Writing | 1 |
| SAGE Open | 1 |
Author
| Pearson, William S. | 1 |
| Zhao, Huahui | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPearson, William S. – SAGE Open, 2022
Due to pressure to meet goals, some test-takers preparing for the IELTS (International English Language Testing System) Writing test solicit written feedback (WF) from an expert provider on their rehearsal essays, in order to identify and close gaps in performance. The extent self-directed candidates are able to utilize written feedback to enhance…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Learner Engagement, Student Reaction
Zhao, Huahui – Assessing Writing, 2010
Existing comparative studies between peer and teacher feedback in English writing classes have predominantly used frequency measures of peer and teacher feedback in learners' revisions to suggest their relative values for developing learners' writing proficiency. However, learners do not necessarily understand the feedback that is used in their…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, English (Second Language), Comprehension
