Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Learning Modules | 3 |
| Scoring | 3 |
| Student Evaluation | 3 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Audits (Verification) | 1 |
| Biological Sciences | 1 |
| Biomedicine | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bunch, Michael B. | 1 |
| Cizek, Gregory J. | 1 |
| Creese, Brian | 1 |
| Hughes, Gwyneth | 1 |
| Hughes, Ian | 1 |
| Koons, Heather | 1 |
| Smith, Holly | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hughes, Gwyneth; Smith, Holly; Creese, Brian – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
This paper considers feedback in the context of modularised programmes in higher education in the UK. It is argued that the self-contained nature of modular assessment may limit feedback dialogue between staff and students to assignment-specific issues, and may impede student progress towards holistic programme-level aims and outcomes. A feedback…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Assignments
Cizek, Gregory J.; Bunch, Michael B.; Koons, Heather – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2004
This module describes some common standard-setting procedures used to derive performance levels for achievement tests in education, licensure, and certification. Upon completing the module, readers will be able to: describe what standard setting is; understand why standard setting is necessary; recognize some of the purposes of standard setting;…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Standard Setting, Academic Standards, Academic Achievement
Hughes, Ian – Bioscience Education e-Journal, 2006
An Assessment Audit is described consisting of 47 questions, each being scored 0 to 4, by the module team depending on the extent to which the audit point was satisfied. Scores of 2 or less indicated unsatisfactory provision. Audits were carried out on 14 bioscience- or medicine-based modules in 13 universities. There was great variability between…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Scoring, Teaching Methods

Peer reviewed
Direct link
