Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 3 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 3 |
| Student Evaluation | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Biotechnology | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Desrochers, Marcie N. | 1 |
| Fink, Herbert C. | 1 |
| Kimmerling, Joe | 1 |
| Laprise, Shari L. | 1 |
| Thomas, Andrea | 1 |
| Tung, Wendy | 1 |
| Wiggins, Grant | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Laprise, Shari L. – College Teaching, 2012
Successful exam composition can be a difficult task. Exams should not only assess student comprehension, but be learning tools in and of themselves. In a biotechnology course delivered to nonmajors at a business college, objective multiple-choice test questions often require students to choose the exception or "not true" choice. Anecdotal student…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Test Items, Multiple Choice Tests, Biotechnology
Desrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing
Wiggins, Grant – Executive Educator, 1994
Instead of relying on standardized test scores and interdistrict comparisons, school systems must develop a more powerful, timely, and local approach to accountability that is truly client-centered and focused on results. Accountability requires giving successful teachers the freedom and opportunity to take effective ideas beyond their own…
Descriptors: Accountability, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Feedback

Peer reviewed
Direct link
