NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20014
Goals 20001
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 75 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Agustín Barroilhet; Mónica Silva; Kurt F. Geisinger – Higher Education Policy, 2025
Merit-based procedures should be constantly reevaluated according to the circumstances to remain both valid and fair--two interrelated concepts. Inducing reevaluation, however, is difficult. These procedures are controlled by legitimate authorities, are rule and contract-bound, and can become quickly entrenched. This resistance to change calls for…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Evaluation, Student Rights, Justice
Phelps, Richard P. – Online Submission, 2020
Ten years ago, the author worked as the Director of Assessments for the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). For temporal context, the author arrived after the first of the infamous test cheating scandals and left just before the incident that spawned a second. Indeed, the author filled a new position created to both manage test security…
Descriptors: Educational Change, School Districts, Public Schools, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gill, Scherto – FORUM: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 2020
During the COVID-19 lockdown, schools are closed, exams have been cancelled, and teaching and learning are taking an unprecedented form. In this process, two realities are brought to light. On the one hand, the pandemic highlights the widening gaps in society and the part that the educational system plays in privileging students from advantageous…
Descriptors: Testing, Testing Problems, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zumbo, Bruno D.; Hubley, Anita M. – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2016
Ultimately, measures in research, testing, assessment and evaluation are used, or have implications, for ranking, intervention, feedback, decision-making or policy purposes. Explicit recognition of this fact brings the often-ignored and sometimes maligned concept of consequences to the fore. Given that measures have personal and social…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Testing Problems, Measurement Techniques, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Santelises, Sonja Brookins – State Education Standard, 2015
For decades, the United States has struggled to make good on its commitment to prepare all its young people, not just some, for the opportunities and responsibilities that await them after high school. The education system has worked to define what kids need to know and be able to do to maximize their options. In this article, the authors discuss…
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Educational Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thissen, David – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2016
David Thissen, a professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Quantitative Program at the University of North Carolina, has consulted and served on technical advisory committees for assessment programs that use item response theory (IRT) over the past couple decades. He has come to the conclusion that there are usually two purposes…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Construction, Testing Problems, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephens, Wendy – Knowledge Quest, 2014
School librarians and other specialists should take note of the new wave of computer-based assessments required by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), testing that is only now beginning to get off the ground. The new testing necessitates that districts possess the right hardware, install the requisite software, and, in some cases, create…
Descriptors: State Standards, Alignment (Education), School Libraries, Librarians
Henning, Grant – English Teaching Forum, 2012
To some extent, good testing procedure, like good language use, can be achieved through avoidance of errors. Almost any language-instruction program requires the preparation and administration of tests, and it is only to the extent that certain common testing mistakes have been avoided that such tests can be said to be worthwhile selection,…
Descriptors: Testing, English (Second Language), Testing Problems, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Elliott, Stephen N.; Davies, Michael; Kettler, Ryan J. – International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2012
Australian legislation and educational policies may espouse, but not yet fully enact, inclusive assessments for all. In relation to the National Assessment Program for Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), for example, almost 5% of students are either exempt or withdrawn. The achievement levels of these students, many of whom have disabilities, are not…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Rating, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cawthon, Stephanie W. – American Annals of the Deaf, 2011
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has had a monumental impact over the past decade on how educational reform is viewed in the United States. As a result of how the law is structured, schools for students who are deaf or hard of hearing have been the focus of attention for educational reform under NCLB. While there have been some shifts…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Federal Legislation, Partial Hearing, Deafness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wright, Robert E. – College Student Journal, 2010
The use of standardized tests for outcome assessment has grown dramatically in recent years. Two driving factors have been the No Child Left Behind legislation, and the increase in outcome assessment measures by accrediting agencies such as AACSB, the international accrediting body for business schools. Despite the growth in usage, little effort…
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Testing, Standardized Tests, Accreditation (Institutions)
Ash, Katie – Education Week, 2008
This article discusses the growing interest in computer-adaptive testing, which supporters say can help guide instruction, increase student motivation, and determine the best use of resources for districts. This method of testing shortens the test by not asking high-achieving students questions that are too easy for them, and likewise not giving…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Student Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yarker, Patrick – FORUM: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 2009
This article, which draws heavily on the Sutherland Inquiry report into the delivery of National Curriculum testing in 2008, outlines important aspects of the failure that year to report test-scores on time, considers the extent to which ministers might have been held more accountable and reviews the state of the long struggle to replace the…
Descriptors: National Curriculum, Student Evaluation, Testing, Testing Problems
Taylor, Ronald L. – Diagnostique, 1988
Though curriculum-based assessment (CBA) is considered a valuable evaluation procedure, areas of concern exist, including: assumptions regarding content of the CBA instrument, appropriateness of CBA as the only information source for individualized education programs, and recognition of CBA's limitations as a procedure/model under the current…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ritter, Leonora – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2000
Describes and evaluates a "controlled assessment procedure" as a holistic approach to avoiding problems of administering and evaluating traditional exams. Key characteristics include: the question is known well in advance and is broad and open-ended, students are encouraged to respond in any self-selected written format, and the rationale and…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Test Format
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5