Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Generational Differences | 5 |
| Learning Strategies | 5 |
| Student Attitudes | 5 |
| Influence of Technology | 3 |
| Student Characteristics | 3 |
| Computer Use | 2 |
| Electronic Learning | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Online Surveys | 2 |
| Student Surveys | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computers & Education | 1 |
| International Review of… | 1 |
| Journal of the Scholarship of… | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
| South African Journal of… | 1 |
Author
| Bullen, Mark | 1 |
| Dunneback, Staci K. | 1 |
| Guitert, Montse | 1 |
| Letha Marie Mellman | 1 |
| Romero, Marc | 1 |
| Sangra, Albert | 1 |
| Steenkamp, L. P. | 1 |
| Therrell, James A. | 1 |
| Thompson, Penny | 1 |
| Wessels, P. L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Postsecondary Education | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
| South Africa | 1 |
| Spain | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkLetha Marie Mellman – ProQuest LLC, 2020
This e-Delphi study explored learning approaches, as defined by Generation Z (Gen Z) learners, in online academic settings and nonacademic settings. It also considered differences between the two panels (38 participants in each panel, representing 39 states) of learners (Academic and Nonacademic) and compared current literature-supported best…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Online Courses, Electronic Learning, Best Practices
Peer reviewed
Download full textTherrell, James A.; Dunneback, Staci K. – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2015
Through prioritizing student voice, this study investigated the perspectives of millennial students in relation to their preferences and priorities for how they desired to experience teaching and learning. While not experts, our assumption was that undergraduate students, because of their relatively long experience as students, would be closely in…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Preferences, Needs Assessment, Student Interests
Thompson, Penny – Computers & Education, 2013
This study investigated the claims made in the popular press about the "digital native" generation as learners. Because students' lives today are saturated with digital media at a time when their brains are still developing, many popular press authors claim that this generation of students thinks and learns differently than any generation that has…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Land Grant Universities, College Freshmen, Student Attitudes
Romero, Marc; Guitert, Montse; Sangra, Albert; Bullen, Mark – International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2013
Some authors have stated that university students born after 1982 have been profoundly influenced by digital technologies, showing different characteristics when compared to previous generations. However, it is worth asking if that is a current observable phenomenon. Are those students born after the 80s really more familiar with ICT tools than…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Technology Uses in Education, Profiles, Computer Use
Wessels, P. L.; Steenkamp, L. P. – South African Journal of Higher Education, 2009
Generation Y students (born after 1982) have developed a different set of attitudes and aptitudes as a result of growing up in an IT and media-rich environment. This article has two objectives: firstly to discuss the learning styles preferred by generation Y students in order to identify the effect of these preferences on tertiary education in…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Teaching Methods, Economics Education
