Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Handwriting | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Mathematics Tests | 1 |
| Secondary School Mathematics | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
Source
| ZDM: Mathematics Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFilip Moons; Paola Iannone; Ellen Vandervieren – ZDM: Mathematics Education, 2024
Handwritten tasks are better suited than digital ones to assess higher-order mathematics skills, as students can express themselves more freely. However, maintaining reliability and providing feedback can be challenging when assessing high-stakes, handwritten mathematics exams involving multiple assessors. This paper discusses a new semi-automated…
Descriptors: Grading, Mathematics Tests, Handwriting, Test Format
