Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 55 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 444 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1987 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6049 |
Descriptor
| Structural Equation Models | 7087 |
| Foreign Countries | 3015 |
| Correlation | 2026 |
| Factor Analysis | 1339 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1271 |
| Questionnaires | 1245 |
| Student Attitudes | 1141 |
| Predictor Variables | 1116 |
| Academic Achievement | 894 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 815 |
| College Students | 771 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Marsh, Herbert W. | 53 |
| Raykov, Tenko | 43 |
| Teo, Timothy | 43 |
| Martin, Andrew J. | 32 |
| Lee, Sik-Yum | 30 |
| Hancock, Gregory R. | 27 |
| Tsai, Chin-Chung | 27 |
| Little, Todd D. | 25 |
| Bentler, Peter M. | 23 |
| Fan, Xitao | 21 |
| Yuan, Ke-Hai | 21 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 42 |
| Teachers | 23 |
| Practitioners | 19 |
| Students | 8 |
| Administrators | 7 |
| Counselors | 7 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Policymakers | 3 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 272 |
| Taiwan | 218 |
| China | 211 |
| Germany | 191 |
| Australia | 159 |
| Malaysia | 129 |
| South Korea | 129 |
| Netherlands | 128 |
| Hong Kong | 125 |
| Spain | 111 |
| Norway | 94 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 7 |
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2024
Compared to traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) has been shown to result in less structural parameter bias when cross-loadings (CLs) are present. However, when model fit is reasonable for CFA (over ESEM), CFA should be preferred on the basis of parsimony. Using simulations, the current…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Goodness of Fit
Joel S. Steele; Kevin J. Grimm – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) continues to grow in popularity with numerous articles, books, courses, and workshops available to help researchers become proficient with SEM quickly. However, few resources are available to help users gain a deep understanding of the analytic steps involved in SEM, with even fewer providing reproducible syntax…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Programming, Orthographic Symbols, Syntax
Walter P. Vispoel; Hyeryung Lee; Hyeri Hong – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
We demonstrate how to analyze complete multivariate generalizability theory (GT) designs within structural equation modeling frameworks that encompass both individual subscale scores and composites formed from those scores. Results from numerous analyses of observed scores obtained from respondents who completed the recently updated form of the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multivariate Analysis, Generalizability Theory, College Students
Jinying Ouyang; Zhehan Jiang; Christine DiStefano; Junhao Pan; Yuting Han; Lingling Xu; Dexin Shi; Fen Cai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Precisely estimating factor scores is challenging, especially when models are mis-specified. Stemming from network analysis, centrality measures offer an alternative approach to estimating the scores. Using a two-fold simulation design with varying availability of a priori theoretical knowledge, this study implemented hybrid centrality to estimate…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Network Analysis, Scores
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Cao, Chunhua; Kim, Eun Sook; Chen, Yi-Hsin; Ferron, John – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2021
This study examined the impact of omitting covariates interaction effect on parameter estimates in multilevel multiple-indicator multiple-cause models as well as the sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification when the between-level, within-level, or cross-level interaction effect was left out in the models. The parameter estimates…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Computation, Models
A. R. Georgeson – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Scores, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias
Hongfeng Zhang; Fanbo Li; Xiaolong Chen – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2025
This study addresses the gap in understanding graduate students' sustained engagement behavior (SEB) with generative artificial intelligence (GAI) by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), and Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) into a comprehensive embedding model. It introduces the Technology…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Artificial Intelligence, Learner Engagement, Foreign Countries
Xinjian Fu; Yingxiang Li – European Journal of Education, 2025
University student academic competitions can test students' learning outcomes, improve their academic performance and stimulate their interest in learning. Exploring the behavioural mechanisms influencing students' academic competition is quite important, but there is currently little research on this topic. This study aims to fill this gap in the…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Participation, Competition, Structural Equation Models
Ming-Chi Tseng – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
This study aims to estimate the latent interaction effect in the CLPM model through a two-step multiple imputation analysis. The estimation of within x within and between x within latent interaction under the CLPM model framework is compared between the one-step Bayesian LMS method and the two-step multiple imputation analysis through a simulation…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Bayesian Statistics, Self Esteem, Depression (Psychology)
Huriyah; Hidayat, Abas – International Journal of Instruction, 2022
The development of technology-based learning cannot replace the teacher's role as an educator, but the teacher who does not want to learn technology, the teacher will be replaced. During the COVID-19 pandemic and the digital era of technology, it provides opportunities for teachers to develop creative ideas in the use of online learning media.…
Descriptors: Models, Preservice Teachers, English (Second Language), Language Teachers
Rohit Batra; Silvia A. Bunge; Emilio Ferrer – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Studying development processes, as they unfold over time, involves collecting repeated measures from individuals and modeling the changes over time. One methodological challenge in this type of longitudinal data is separating retest effects, due to the repeated assessments, from developmental processes such as maturation or age. In this article,…
Descriptors: Children, Adolescents, Longitudinal Studies, Test Reliability
Ulrich Schroeders; Florian Scharf; Gabriel Olaru – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Metaheuristics are optimization algorithms that efficiently solve a variety of complex combinatorial problems. In psychological research, metaheuristics have been applied in short-scale construction and model specification search. In the present study, we propose a bee swarm optimization (BSO) algorithm to explore the structure underlying a…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Heuristics, Algorithms, Measurement Techniques
Naoto Yamashita – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Matrix decomposition structural equation modeling (MDSEM) is introduced as a novel approach in structural equation modeling, contrasting with traditional structural equation modeling (SEM). MDSEM approximates the data matrix using a model generated by the hypothetical model and addresses limitations faced by conventional SEM procedures by…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Structure, Robustness (Statistics), Matrices
Tenko Raykov; Bingsheng Zhang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Multidimensional measuring instruments are often used in behavioral, social, educational, marketing, and biomedical research. For these scales, the paper discusses how to find the optimal score based on their components that is associated with the highest possible reliability. Within the framework of structural equation modeling, an approach to…
Descriptors: Multidimensional Scaling, Measurement Equipment, Measurement Techniques, Test Reliability

Peer reviewed
Direct link
