Descriptor
| Goodness of Fit | 3 |
| Learning Theories | 3 |
| Stimulus Generalization | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Discrimination Learning | 2 |
| Kindergarten Children | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Verbal Stimuli | 2 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Dimensional Preference | 1 |
| Tables (Data) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSpiker, Charles C.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Rejoinder to PS 502 062 which in turn is an alternative analysis of authors' study presented in PS 502 061. (MB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Learning Theories, Models
Peer reviewedBogartz, Richard S. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Alternative analysis to study reported in PS 502 061. Rejoinder presented in PS 502 063. (MB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewedSpiker, Charles C.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Predictions for multidimensional generalization were derived from Hull-Spence learning theory, and an experiment is reported that was designed to test this aspect of the theory. Alternative to this analysis is presented in PS 502 062; authors respond in PS 502 063. (Authors/MB)
Descriptors: Dimensional Preference, Discrimination Learning, Goodness of Fit, Kindergarten Children
