Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Differences | 3 |
| Sample Size | 3 |
| Statistical Analysis | 3 |
| Test Bias | 3 |
| Test Length | 3 |
| Ability | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Arsan, Nihan | 1 |
| Atalay Kabasakal, Kübra | 1 |
| Bulut, Okan | 1 |
| Geisinger, Kurt F. | 1 |
| Gök, Bilge | 1 |
| Kelecioglu, Hülya | 1 |
| Lee, HyeSun | 1 |
| Lee, Soo | 1 |
| Suh, Youngsuk | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLee, Soo; Bulut, Okan; Suh, Youngsuk – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
A number of studies have found multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) models to be an effective tool in detecting uniform differential item functioning (DIF) for individual items and item bundles. A recently developed MIMIC-interaction model is capable of detecting both uniform and nonuniform DIF in the unidimensional item response theory…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Items, Models, Item Response Theory
Lee, HyeSun; Geisinger, Kurt F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
The current study investigated the impact of matching criterion purification on the accuracy of differential item functioning (DIF) detection in large-scale assessments. The three matching approaches for DIF analyses (block-level matching, pooled booklet matching, and equated pooled booklet matching) were employed with the Mantel-Haenszel…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Measurement, Accuracy, Statistical Analysis
Download full textAtalay Kabasakal, Kübra; Arsan, Nihan; Gök, Bilge; Kelecioglu, Hülya – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2014
This simulation study compared the performances (Type I error and power) of Mantel-Haenszel (MH), SIBTEST, and item response theory-likelihood ratio (IRT-LR) methods under certain conditions. Manipulated factors were sample size, ability differences between groups, test length, the percentage of differential item functioning (DIF), and underlying…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis, Test Bias
