Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for Program… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRindskopf, David – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
Modeling the process by which participants are selected into groups, rather than adjusting for preexisting group differences, provides the basis for several new approaches to the analysis of data from nonrandomized studies. Econometric approaches, the propensity scores approach, and the relative assignment variable approach to the modeling of…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Experimental Groups, Intelligence Quotient, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedReichardt, Charles; Gollob, Harry – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
Causal models often omit variables that should be included, use variables that are measured fallibly, and ignore time lags. Such practices can lead to severely biased estimates of effects. The discussion explains these biases and shows how to take them into account. (Author)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Error of Measurement, High Schools, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedHedges, Larry V. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1984
The adequacy of traditional effect size measures for research synthesis is challenged. Analogues to analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis for effect sizes are presented. The importance of tests for the consistency of effect sizes in interpreting results, and problems in obtaining well-specified models for meta-analysis are…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Effect Size, Mathematical Models, Meta Analysis


