Descriptor
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 4 |
Author
| Bassett, James | 1 |
| Frary, Robert B. | 1 |
| Geisinger, Kurt F. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Murphy, Edward | 1 |
| Roznowski, Mary | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRoznowski, Mary; Bassett, James – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
Current coaching practices used in training test wiseness for analogy items on standardized test batteries were investigated in a 3-group design involving about 100 undergraduates in each condition. The largest improvement came in items in the middle range of difficulty, but overall effects of coaching were important. (SLD)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Standardized Tests, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedFrary, Robert B. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1993
Methods for detecting copying of multiple-choice test responses are reviewed and compared with respect to their effectiveness and the practicality of their application for groups of varying sizes. Reasons why effective detection methods are seldom applied in standardized and classroom testing are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGeisinger, Kurt F. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Federal law requires that individuals with handicapping conditions be administered assessments in ways that accommodate their disabilities without penalizing them. Validation studies are needed to evaluate the meaning of scores resulting from nonstandard test administrations. The limited number of these studies to date is reviewed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Assessment, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedHambleton, Ronald K.; Murphy, Edward – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
The validity of several criticisms of objective tests is addressed, and the viability of some alternatives to objective testing is discussed. Evidence against multiple-choice tests is not as strong as has been claimed. Authentic assessments may not always be better, and research about new forms of assessment is necessary. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Assessment, Literature Reviews, Measurement Techniques


