Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Norm Referenced Tests | 1 |
| Reading Achievement | 1 |
| Reading Difficulties | 1 |
| Reading Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| School Psychology Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
January, Stacy-Ann A.; Ardoin, Scott P.; Christ, Theodore J.; Eckert, Tanya L.; White, Mary Jane – School Psychology Review, 2016
Universal screening in elementary schools often includes administering curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R); but in first grade, nonsense word fluency (NWF) and, to a lesser extent, word identification fluency (WIF) are used because of concerns that CBM-R is too difficult for emerging readers. This study used Kane's argument-based…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Reading Tests, Test Interpretation, Test Use

Peer reviewed
