Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 26 |
| Testing | 26 |
| Standards | 11 |
| Scoring | 8 |
| Test Construction | 8 |
| Test Items | 7 |
| Cutting Scores | 6 |
| Higher Education | 6 |
| Academic Standards | 5 |
| Comparative Analysis | 5 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Nebraska | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Teacher Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
New Meridian Corporation, 2020
New Meridian Corporation has developed the "Quality Testing Standards and Criteria for Comparability Claims" (QTS). The goal of the QTS is to provide guidance to states that are interested in including content from the New Meridian item bank and intend to make comparability claims with "other assessments" that include New…
Descriptors: Testing, Standards, Comparative Analysis, Guidelines
New Meridian Corporation, 2020
New Meridian Corporation has developed the "Quality Testing Standards and Criteria for Comparability Claims" (QTS). The goal of the QTS is to provide guidance to states that are interested in including content from the New Meridian item bank and intend to make comparability claims with "other assessments" that include New…
Descriptors: Testing, Standards, Comparative Analysis, Guidelines
Boyer, Michelle; Dadey, Nathan; Keng, Leslie – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2020
This school year, every state education agency (SEA) is faced with unprecedented, COVID-19-related challenges for the implementation of 2021 statewide summative assessments. Two overarching challenges are in how tests will be administered, and how scores will be interpreted and used, with many intervening and related challenges. Test…
Descriptors: State Departments of Education, Summative Evaluation, Educational Planning, Educational Strategies
New Meridian Corporation, 2020
New Meridian Corporation has developed the "Quality Testing Standards and Criteria for Comparability Claims" (QTS) to provide guidance to states that are interested in including New Meridian content and would like to either keep reporting scores on the New Meridian Scale or use the New Meridian performance levels; that is, the state…
Descriptors: Testing, Standards, Comparative Analysis, Test Content
Nebraska Department of Education, 2018
The 2018 Nebraska Student-Centered Assessment System (NSCAS) Summative technical report documents the processes and procedures implemented to support the Spring 2018 NSCAS Summative English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics, and Science assessments by NWEA under the supervision of the Nebraska Department of Education (NDE). The technical report…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Language Tests, English, Mathematics Tests
Wyse, Adam E. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2015
This article uses data from a large-scale assessment program to illustrate the potential issue of range restriction with the Bookmark method in the context of trying to set cut scores to closely align with a set of college and career readiness benchmarks. Analyses indicated that range restriction issues existed across different response…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Alignment (Education), College Readiness, Career Readiness
MacCann, Robert G.; Stanley, Gordon – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2009
An item banking method that does not use Item Response Theory (IRT) is described. This method provides a comparable grading system across schools that would be suitable for low-stakes testing. It uses the Angoff standard-setting method to obtain item ratings that are stored with each item. An example of such a grading system is given, showing how…
Descriptors: Item Banks, Testing, Standard Setting (Scoring), Methods
Judd, Wallace – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2009
Over the past twenty years in performance testing a specific item type with distinguishing characteristics has arisen time and time again. It's been invented independently by dozens of test development teams. And yet this item type is not recognized in the research literature. This article is an invitation to investigate the item type, evaluate…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Format, Evaluation, Item Analysis
Brandon, Paul R. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2004
This article reviews the empirical literature on 9 topics about the modified Angoff standard-setting method that have been studied repeatedly in the literature, while taking into consideration the methodological warrant for the findings on the topics. It concludes that we can be reasonably confident about selecting the appropriate number of judges…
Descriptors: Test Items, Standard Setting (Scoring), Research Methodology, Testing
Meskauskas, John A. – 1978
The ways in which standard-setting procedures are carried out in the medical specialty certification area are described. Three experiments that have been conducted with alternatives to currently used normative standards are examined, and reasons why these experiments have had limited success are suggested in this speech. The defensibility of…
Descriptors: Certification, Higher Education, Medical Education, Physicians
Giraud, Gerald; Impara, James C.; Plake, Barbara S. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2005
In cut score setting processes, subject matter experts are asked to make judgments about the likely performance of examinees at a targeted skill level. When cut scores are used in K-12 settings to separate students who have and have not mastered certain skills, the target examinee may be characterized as the barely proficient or barely master…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Workshops
Peer reviewedJournal of School Improvement, 2000
States that standard scores are the numerical universal language for reporting and comparisons. Discusses what standard scores are, specifically, and why they are used, along with how the conversion assessment of raw scores to standard scores is accomplished. Provides contact information for those who would like to further their knowledge on the…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Jones, J. Patrick; And Others – 1988
Three studies assessed the psychometric characteristics of the Direct Standard Setting Method (DSSM). The Angoff technique was also used in each study. The DSSM requires judges to consider an examination 10 items at a time and determine the minimum items in that set a candidate should answer correctly to receive the credential. Nine judges set a…
Descriptors: Certification, Credentials, Cutting Scores, Health Personnel
Peer reviewedHambleton, Ronald K., Ed. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1980
This special issue covers recent technical developments in the field of criterion-referenced testing. An introduction, six papers, and two commentaries dealing with test development, test score uses, and evaluation of scores review relevant literature, offer new models and/or results, and suggest directions for additional research. (SLD)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests, Measurement Techniques, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewedHambleton, Ronald K.; Powell, Sally – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1983
To address the issues associated with testing standards, sets of context-setting variables and technical matters associated with standard-setting are presented to assist groups or committees desiring to set standards in a systematic way. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Certification, Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
