NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)0
Since 2007 (last 20 years)5
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Iyioke, Ifeoma Chika – ProQuest LLC, 2013
This dissertation describes a design for training, in accordance with probability judgment heuristics principles, for the Angoff standard setting method. The new training with instruction, practice, and feedback tailored to the probability judgment heuristics principles was called the Heuristic training and the prevailing Angoff method training…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Probability, Heuristics, Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurtado, Sylvia; Pryor, John H. – College and University, 2011
The primary users of the current college ranking systems do not seem to be high-school students and families, but college presidents, board members, and development officers. As structured, the commercial ranking systems imply a precision that is not corroborated by research on what matters in college, nor can college quality be accurately summed…
Descriptors: College Choice, Educational Quality, Program Effectiveness, School Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Baldwin, Su G.; Margolis, Melissa J.; Dillon, Gerard F. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
Although the Angoff procedure is among the most widely used standard setting procedures for tests comprising multiple-choice items, research has shown that subject matter experts have considerable difficulty accurately making the required judgments in the absence of examinee performance data. Some authors have viewed the need to provide…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Program Effectiveness, Expertise, Health Personnel
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ferrara, Steve; Perie, Marianne; Johnson, Eugene – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2008
Psychometricians continue to introduce new approaches to setting cut scores for educational assessments in an attempt to improve on current methods. In this paper we describe the Item-Descriptor (ID) Matching method, a method based on IRT item mapping. In ID Matching, test content area experts match items (i.e., their judgments about the knowledge…
Descriptors: Test Results, Test Content, Testing Programs, Educational Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jacobson, Eric – Journal of General Education, 2006
A rigorous placement exam introduced into a university Developmental Mathematics program increased course success rates, retention, and enrollment rates in math courses, but reduced completion rates in Developmental Math and standard math courses required for a degree. Results suggest an inverse relationship between course success rates and total…
Descriptors: Student Placement, College Mathematics, Developmental Programs, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reckase, Mark D. – Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 2001
This paper provides an analysis of the controversy surrounding the standard setting process conducted by ACT Inc. for the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). This process is the most thoroughly planned, carefully executed, exhaustively evaluated, completely documented, and most visible of any standard setting process of which the author is…
Descriptors: Research and Development, Academic Achievement, National Competency Tests, Governing Boards
Gorth, William Phillip; Perkins, Marcy R. – 1979
This resource document represents the integration of both practice and theory related to minimum competency testing (MCT), and is largely based on information collected in a nationwide survey of MCT programs. Chapter 1, To Implement or Not to Implement MCT, by Marcy R. Perkins, presents a definition of MCT and a discussion of the perceived…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Competence, Diffusion, Elementary Secondary Education