NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 45 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peabody, Michael R.; Muckle, Timothy J.; Meng, Yu – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2023
The subjective aspect of standard-setting is often criticized, yet data-driven standard-setting methods are rarely applied. Therefore, we applied a mixture Rasch model approach to setting performance standards across several testing programs of various sizes and compared the results to existing passing standards derived from traditional…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Standard Setting, Testing, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Beheshti, Shima; Safa, Mohammad Ahmadi – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2023
The indefinite nature of test fairness and different interpretations and definitions of the concept have stirred a lot of controversy over the years, necessitating the reconceptualization of the concept. On this basis, this study aimed to explore the empirical validity of Kunnan's (2008) Test Fairness Framework (TFF) and revisit the established…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Equal Education, Grounded Theory, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hakan Baran; Murat Akyildiz – Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2025
Evaluation decisions regarding students' success in Open Education faculties such as pass/fail based on cut-off scores affect the quality of these systems. The qualification of Open Education students to obtain a bachelor's or associate's degree is determined by their passing grade. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the minimum…
Descriptors: Open Universities, Academic Standards, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Suthathip Thirakunkovit – Language Testing in Asia, 2025
Establishing a cut score is a crucial aspect of the test development process since the selected cut score has the potential to impact students' performance outcomes and shape instructional strategies within the classroom. Therefore, it is vital for those involved in test development to set a cut score that is both fair and justifiable. This cut…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Culture Fair Tests, Language Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Kane, Michael; Clauser, Jerome C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
An Angoff standard setting study generally yields judgments on a number of items by a number of judges (who may or may not be nested in panels). Variability associated with judges (and possibly panels) contributes error to the resulting cut score. The variability associated with items plays a more complicated role. To the extent that the mean item…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Generalization, Decision Making, Standard Setting
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peabody, Michael R.; Wind, Stefanie A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
Setting performance standards is a judgmental process involving human opinions and values as well as technical and empirical considerations. Although all cut score decisions are by nature somewhat arbitrary, they should not be capricious. Judges selected for standard-setting panels should have the proper qualifications to make the judgments asked…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Decision Making, Performance Based Assessment, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davidson, Simon – Language Testing, 2022
This paper investigates what matters to medical domain experts when setting standards on a language for specific purposes (LSP) English proficiency test: the Occupational English Test's (OET) writing sub-test. The study explores what standard-setting participants value when making performance judgements about test candidates' writing responses,…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Writing Tests, Standard Setting, Health Personnel
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Evans, Carla M. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2023
Large-scale performance assessment programs are a longstanding reform tool. However, standard setting can be a challenge for assessment programs that use primarily non-standardized assessments. The purpose of this paper is to extend this field of research by explaining the standard setting methodology applied to one more recent instantiation of a…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Accountability, Performance Based Assessment, State Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Furter, Robert T. – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2019
Standard setting is the process of identifying the point(s) on a scale that serve to differentiate between individuals of distinct proficiency levels. While standard setting is ultimately a policy decision, most of the process is carried out by subject matter experts who are tasked with reconciling item-level or examinee-level information (e.g.…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bichi, Ado Abdu; Talib, Rohaya; Embong, Rahimah; Mohamed, Hasnah Binti; Ismail, Mohd Sani; Ibrahim, Abdallah – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019
Purpose: University placement test is an important admission policy priority in Nigeria, because it serves as a university-based selection criterion for placement of students into undergraduate programs in Nigeria. Although recently attention have been shifted on the call to develop a standard content and standardize the test, yet attention has…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Economics Education, Student Placement, Cutting Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harsch, Claudia; Kanistra, Voula Paraskevi – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2020
We report on a standard-setting project in which the Item-Descriptor-Matching Method (IDM) and a complementary benchmarking approach were employed to align a suite of English language proficiency exams to the "Common European Framework of Reference" (CEFR), with a particular focus on the integrated and independent writing exams. Judges'…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Guidelines, Rating Scales, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petrosky, Anthony – English in Australia, 2021
The space between the two epigraphs presented at the beginning of this article marks the difference between an insider and an outsider. Ms Barbieri, from "Voices from the Middle," made the first comments as an expression of what reflective practice -- observing and critiquing video tapes of hers and others' teaching -- could mean to her…
Descriptors: National Standards, Teacher Certification, English Teachers, English Instruction
Moyer, Eric L.; Galindo, Jennifer – National Assessment Governing Board, 2022
The National Assessment Governing Board has a legislatively mandated responsibility to develop National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) achievement levels. The Board Policy Statement on Developing Student Achievement Levels for the National Assessment of Educational Progress provides policy definitions of "NAEP Basic,"…
Descriptors: Reading Achievement, Mathematics Achievement, Reading Tests, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brunfaut, Tineke; Harding, Luke – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2020
In the field of second and foreign language learning, the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR) is widely-used for setting language proficiency standards within European, and increasingly global, contexts. Few studies, however, have investigated the ways in which systemic, macro-level factors within national educational…
Descriptors: Language Proficiency, Standards, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Jerome C.; Hambleton, Ronald K.; Baldwin, Peter – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
The Angoff standard setting method relies on content experts to review exam items and make judgments about the performance of the minimally proficient examinee. Unfortunately, at times content experts may have gaps in their understanding of specific exam content. These gaps are particularly likely to occur when the content domain is broad and/or…
Descriptors: Scores, Item Analysis, Classification, Decision Making
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3