Descriptor
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Program Development | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Program Implementation | 1 |
| Research Problems | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
| Stakeholders | 1 |
| Student Motivation | 1 |
Source
| New Directions for Program… | 1 |
Author
| Farrar, Eleanor | 1 |
| House, Ernest R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFarrar, Eleanor; House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
The evaluators of Push/Excel assumed that it was a systematically developed program with measurable outcomes, not a charismatically inspired movement whose effects would be hard to pin down. As a result, neither the program nor the evaluation approach used were adequately tested. (Author)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Development, Program Evaluation
