Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 13 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 96 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 240 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 389 |
Descriptor
| Interference (Language) | 1086 |
| Second Language Learning | 1086 |
| English (Second Language) | 584 |
| Foreign Countries | 293 |
| Contrastive Linguistics | 286 |
| Second Language Instruction | 258 |
| Error Analysis (Language) | 240 |
| Language Instruction | 234 |
| Native Language | 220 |
| Grammar | 217 |
| Teaching Methods | 210 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Catran, Jack | 7 |
| White, Lydia | 5 |
| Burt, Marina K. | 4 |
| Filipovic, Rudolf | 4 |
| Marian, Viorica | 4 |
| Zobl, Helmut | 4 |
| Aziz, Yowell Y. | 3 |
| Bordag, Denisa | 3 |
| Dulay, Heidi C. | 3 |
| Flege, James Emil | 3 |
| Hakuta, Kenji | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 163 |
| Postsecondary Education | 130 |
| Secondary Education | 24 |
| Elementary Education | 23 |
| High Schools | 16 |
| Adult Education | 8 |
| Middle Schools | 7 |
| Grade 2 | 6 |
| Grade 1 | 5 |
| Grade 3 | 5 |
| Junior High Schools | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Practitioners | 27 |
| Teachers | 21 |
| Students | 5 |
| Researchers | 2 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| China | 25 |
| Saudi Arabia | 19 |
| Thailand | 19 |
| Canada | 16 |
| Indonesia | 13 |
| Japan | 12 |
| Spain | 12 |
| Hong Kong | 11 |
| Turkey | 11 |
| United Kingdom | 10 |
| South Korea | 8 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| National Defense Education… | 2 |
| Bilingual Education Act 1968 | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Acquisition of Second Languages Perceived as "Close" or "Remote": The Perspective of Error Analysis.
Peer reviewedLaroche, Jacques M. – System, 1983
Discusses the theories of contrastive analysis and error analysis in second language learning with regard to the idea that a language closely related to one's own native language is easier to learn that a remotely related one. (EKN)
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Error Analysis (Language), Interference (Language), Interlanguage
Peer reviewedHagiwara, Akira; Kuzumaki, Yukinori – System, 1982
Presents study constructed to consider what kind of errors of misperception of English pronunciation by Japanese are revealed in dictation. Results show errors of segmental sounds are caused by interference from Japanese. Believes dictation provides means of exact, immediate, and simple key feedback to learner. (Author/BK)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Interference (Language), Listening Comprehension, Pronunciation
Peer reviewedFlege, James Emil; Port, Robert – Language and Speech, 1981
Compares phonetic implementation of the stop-voicing contrast produced in Arabic by Saudi Arabians and by both Americans and Saudis in English. Saudis used temporal aspects of voicing in Arabic while speaking English. This caused few communication problems, with the exception of the phoneme (p), which has no Arabic counterpart. (Author/PJM)
Descriptors: Arabic, Contrastive Linguistics, Descriptive Linguistics, English
Peer reviewedWeber-Olsen, Marcia; Ruder, Kenneth F. – Applied Psycholinguistics, 1980
Presents a comparison study of language learning in American children and adults using various Japanese locatives. The subjects were pre- and posttested to determine if locatives that were semantically similar to their English equivalents would yield better transfer than terms that deviated in meaning and phonemic structure in English. (BK)
Descriptors: Adults, English, Interference (Language), Japanese
Peer reviewedLyczak, Richard A. – Language and Speech, 1979
Prior to a Thai language learning session, subjects were exposed to recorded Thai conversation, Japanese conversation, or music. The subjects exposed to Thai produced more words than subjects exposed to music or Japanese. The subjects exposed to Japanese produced the fewest words. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Interference (Language), Language Instruction
Peer reviewedRemsbury, John A. – British Journal of Language Teaching, 1988
Considers interference problems of Arabic-speaking learners of French and English on four levels: single-word; grammar-rule; intonation; and the study of French and English literature. (CB)
Descriptors: Arabic, English (Second Language), French, Interference (Language)
Peer reviewedVanPatten, Bill – ADFL Bulletin, 1992
Details six major research findings regarding second-language acquisition, including transitional stages for acquiring syntax; fixed-order emergence of grammatical morphemes; language acquisition progress from unmarked to marked elements; first-language influence; rule-governed learner output; and learner access to input. (27 references) (CB)
Descriptors: Interference (Language), Language Research, Language Teachers, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewedNation, Paul – TESOL Journal, 2000
Examines research on learning related vocabulary, such as lexical sets, a unit of vocabulary or specific items sharing certain formal or semantic features. This research shows that learning related words at the same time makes learning them more difficult and suggests that this difficulty can be avoided if related words are learned separately.…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Interference (Language), Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewedBenson, Cathy – ELT Journal, 2002
Highlights current thinking on transfer or crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition and discuses implications for second language teaching. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Interference (Language), Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewedBitextina, G. A. – Slavic and East European Journal, 1975
Inexact uses of adverbs by students of Russian which are believed to be caused in part by native language interference are discussed. (RM)
Descriptors: Adverbs, Form Classes (Languages), Grammar, Interference (Language)
Peer reviewedMarton, Waldemar – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1972
Pessimism regarding pedagogical applications of contrastive studies, and reasons therefore, are described. Several misunderstandings believed to contribute to this pessimism, and several areas of controversy concerning uses of contrastive studies, are discussed. See FL 508 197 for availability. (RM)
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Interference (Language), Language Instruction, Psycholinguistics
Peer reviewedBergen, John J. – Hispania, 1974
Descriptors: Interference (Language), Language Instruction, Phonemics, Phonology
Banczerowska, Maria – Glottodidactica, 1975
The aim of this article is to account for some of the difficulties facing speakers of Polish learning Finnish and vice versa. (Author/RM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Consonants, Contrastive Linguistics, Finnish
Kopczynski, Andrzej – Glottodidactica, 1975
Describes a research study into this pronunciation problem. It was found that: (1) the subjects tended to substitute stops and affricates more readily than sibilants and fricatives; (2) there was considerable /s z/ substitution, but no/f v/ substitutions; (3) the pattern of subsitutions proved independent of the level of English proficiency. (RM)
Descriptors: Consonants, Contrastive Linguistics, English, Interference (Language)
ROLAND, LYN – 1966
A GROUP OF 136 STUDENTS IN GERMAN ONE, TWO, AND THREE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY PARTICIPATED IN AN EXPERIMENT IN WHICH TESTS WERE MADE OF THEIR PRONUNCIATION OF INITIAL GERMAN "S" CLUSTERS (THOSE WHICH ARE SPELLED "S--" AND THOSE SPELLED "SCH--"). THIS PARTICULAR PRONUNCIATION PROBLEM WAS SELECTED BECAUSE THE GERMAN AND ENGLISH…
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, German, Interference (Language), Language Research


