Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Individual Differences | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Theories | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Advanced Students | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Iran | 1 |
| United Kingdom (Reading) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textJalali, Hanan; Rahimi, Mohammad – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2022
Implicit theory (Dweck, 2000) suggests that learners' theories about the malleability of their individual traits (learning style, here) determine the extent to which they can stretch their learning style (Gregersen & MacIntyre, 2014; Young, 2010) and benefit from the instruction that mismatches their preferred styles. The present study aimed…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Direct linkLee, Gabriel A. – Reading Psychology, 2006
Nassaji and Geva (1999) concluded that lower level processes, particularly efficiency in phonological and orthographic processing contributed significantly to individual differences in adult ESL reading. Moreover, they reported that speed of letter naming, while not directly associated with reading comprehension, was related to linguistic…
Descriptors: Mathematical Formulas, Reading Ability, Reading Achievement, Factor Analysis
