Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| American Sign Language | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Bilingual Education | 1 |
| Common Core State Standards | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Sign Language Studies | 2 |
Author
| Leala Holcomb | 1 |
| Stedt, Joe | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkLeala Holcomb – Sign Language Studies, 2024
This investigation aimed to explore the feasibility of implementing the strategic and interactive signing instruction (SISI) framework and its potential to enhance the signed composition skills of four deaf students in a first/second-grade classroom. SISI was adapted from the existing strategic and interactive writing instruction (SIWI) framework…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Deafness, Teaching Methods, Grade 1
Peer reviewedStedt, Joe; And Others – Sign Language Studies, 1987
Second-, fifth-, and eleventh-graders (N=102) trained and tested on recalling the meanings of 64 American Sign Language nouns and verbs performed significantly better on recalling signs of high translucency and signs learned with mnemonic explanations. Fifth graders did better than the other two groups. (CB)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Grade 11
