Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 6 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 47 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 99 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 133 |
Descriptor
| Feedback (Response) | 133 |
| Second Language Learning | 133 |
| Written Language | 133 |
| English (Second Language) | 89 |
| Foreign Countries | 82 |
| Second Language Instruction | 82 |
| Error Correction | 80 |
| Teaching Methods | 51 |
| Student Attitudes | 43 |
| Grammar | 30 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 30 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Bitchener, John | 5 |
| Lee, Icy | 3 |
| Choi, Bumyong | 2 |
| Dimino, Joseph A. | 2 |
| Kim, Binna | 2 |
| Kim, YouJin | 2 |
| Knoch, Ute | 2 |
| Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim | 2 |
| Morris, Joan | 2 |
| Nassaji, Hossein | 2 |
| Sheen, Younghee | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 5 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| China | 9 |
| Iran | 9 |
| Turkey | 8 |
| Canada | 5 |
| Australia | 4 |
| New Zealand | 4 |
| South Korea | 4 |
| Ethiopia | 3 |
| Hong Kong | 3 |
| Iraq | 3 |
| Spain | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 3 |
| Learning Style Inventory | 1 |
| Motivated Strategies for… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ornuma Chingchit – LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 2024
It is widely accepted that written corrective feedback (WCF) is an effective tool for helping learners develop their L2 knowledge. Yet, it remains inconclusive as to which type of WCF can best facilitate L2 learning. In recent years, many second language acquisition (SLA) researchers agree that "direct" and "focused" WCF may be…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Language Acquisition
Neda Soleimani; José David Herazo; Mohammad Rahimi – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2025
L2 teachers' written feedback (WF) has been widely researched as one key cognitive factor in students' learning of a new language. Little research, however, has viewed WF as a contextually embodied and socially mediated activity that may be influenced by professional development. We compared five Iranian EFL teachers' WF before and after a…
Descriptors: Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language), Language Teachers
Abderrahim Mamad; Tibor Vígh – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
This study aimed to investigate university students' preferences for and reported instructor practices of written feedback (WF) and how these align with instructors' perceptions and self-reported practices in EFL writing classrooms. An 80-item survey was conducted with 13 instructors and their 210 students at a Moroccan university. The findings…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language)
Miao, Jia; Chang, Jiangmei; Ma, Li – SAGE Open, 2023
Written corrective feedback in Second Language Writing is one of the most important parts in L2 Acquisition and Language Teaching. CiteSpace is a convenient and effective bibliometric analysis tool which is widely used by researchers to explore the development tends of a certain field. The Web of Science core collection database was used as the…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Trend Analysis, Written Language, Error Correction
Xiaoyan Zhang; Min Wang – Language Teaching Research, 2025
This study examines the effects of the continuation task and the model-as-feedback writing task (MAFW) on English as a foreign language (EFL) vocabulary learning. Three classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to a continuation group, a MAFW group, and a control group. Three aspects of vocabulary knowledge --…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Models, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Maria-Lourdes Lira-Gonzales; Hossein Nassaji; Kuok-Wa Chao Chao – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
An increasing number of studies have explored the effects of collaborative writing on written outcomes; however, few studies have examined the influence of collaborative processing of feedback. This study addresses this gap by focusing on learner engagement. While collaborative writing involves co-authoring a text, which requires negotiation and…
Descriptors: Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Kim, YouJin; Choi, Bumyong; Yun, Hyunae; Kim, Binna; Choi, Sujeong – Language Teaching Research, 2022
Recently, there has been a shift in the perception of tasks. Tasks are no longer viewed as 'one-off' activities, and the importance of studying the role of task repetition has been increasingly addressed (Bygate, 2018). However, the way task repetition effects are mediated by other instructional conditions such as corrective feedback has not been…
Descriptors: Repetition, Synchronous Communication, Written Language, Error Correction
Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam – SAGE Open, 2024
Although, written corrective feedback (hereafter referred to as CF) is applauded in many writing courses for fostering students' quality writing, its impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 students' writing remains a debated topic. Thus, this study looked into the effect of CF types on L2 students' grammatical accuracy in writing. To achieve this…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Gabriel Michaud; Kim McDonough; Mariane Parent – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
This study examines the impact of written corrective feedback (WCF) timing on the collaborative writing process and writing accuracy development of adult learners of French as a second language. Forty-eight learners were divided into three groups to complete a collaborative writing task in pairs. The first group received immediate WCF via Google…
Descriptors: Time Factors (Learning), Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Sato, Ryuichi – ProQuest LLC, 2022
This dissertation study investigated how L2 doctoral students regulate their emotions upon receiving written feedback from their mentors. The study took a multiple-case-study approach that entailed stimulated recall of the feedback-reading and revision process. Three international doctoral students who were engaged in high-stakes writing in the…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Doctoral Students, Emotional Response, Self Control
Soomin Jwa – TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, 2025
With increasing attention to student engagement with feedback, the need for a paradigm shift problematizing the transmissive view of feedback has been voiced. Recent perspectives hold that feedback is a dialogic process and opportunities for dialogue promote students' knowledge-making processes in their engagement with feedback. Theoretically…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Learner Engagement, Models
Shen, Rongyi; Chong, Sin Wang – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Although research on the efficacy of written corrective feedback has received considerable attention in recent years, there is a dearth of research on learner engagement with written corrective feedback. Understanding how language learners engage with written corrective feedback is high on the agenda of feedback research because it provides a…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Investigating Learner Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback in a Thai Higher Education Context
Jinowat, Nattwut; Wiboolyasarin, Watcharapol – TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 2022
The current study investigated EFL learners' preferences for written corrective feedback (WCF) and the rationale for their preferences. A mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection, was used to explore this phenomenon. The data were collected using an internet-based questionnaire and a semi-structured interview.…
Descriptors: Preferences, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
