Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Error Correction | 73 |
| Feedback | 73 |
| Second Language Learning | 73 |
| Second Language Instruction | 53 |
| English (Second Language) | 29 |
| Grammar | 23 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 21 |
| Foreign Countries | 21 |
| Higher Education | 16 |
| College Students | 14 |
| Writing Instruction | 14 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Lyster, Roy | 5 |
| Heift, Trude | 3 |
| Akahori, Kanji | 2 |
| Burston, Jack | 2 |
| Carroll, Susanne | 2 |
| Chan, Alice Y. W. | 2 |
| Eskenazi, Maxine | 2 |
| Han, ZhaoHong | 2 |
| Hedgcock, John | 2 |
| Hyland, Fiona | 2 |
| Nagata, Noriko | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hamid, Obaidul – ELT Journal, 2007
The research reported in the study was undertaken to measure English language teachers' ability to interpret second language learners' intended meanings in idiosyncratic utterances in written English. In doing so, it also aimed at verifying Corder's (1981) speculation that language teachers can correctly guess the intended meanings of learners in…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Error Correction, Language Teachers, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewedHeift, Trude; Schulze, Mathias – CALICO Journal, 2003
Introduces this special issue of the journal, which focuses on an important aspect of learner language--linguistic errors. Each of the nine articles are highlighted. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Error Correction, Feedback, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedSchachter, Jacquelyn – Second Language Research, 1991
Pedagogical, linguistic theoretical, and psychological perspectives on corrective feedback in the field of second-language learning/teaching are discussed, and an attempt is made to integrate these different perspectives. (39 references) (JL)
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback, Linguistic Theory, Psychology
Peer reviewedMorris, Frank A. – Foreign Language Annals, 2002
Assessed the provision and use of implicit negative feedback in the interactional context of adult beginning learners of Spanish working in dyads in the foreign language classroom. Relationships among error types, feedback types, and immediate learner repair were also examined. Findings indicate learners did not provide explicit negative feedback…
Descriptors: Adults, Error Correction, Feedback, Introductory Courses
Peer reviewedGascoigne, Carolyn – French Review, 2003
Examines types of corrective feedback, their distribution, and effects, most ostensibly uptake, as produced in nonnative/nonnative conversational dyads in French. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback, French, Interaction
Peer reviewedTschichold, Cornelia – CALICO Journal, 2003
To overcome obstacles in error detection needed for intelligent feedback in computer assisted language learning (CALL), calls for a new focus on lexical items, both single words and multiword units of various types. Suggests single and multiword lexemes should not only be explicitly taught in CALL but could also provide the key to more effective…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Error Correction, Feedback, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedNicholas, Howard; Lightbown, Patsy M.; Spada, Nina – Language Learning, 2001
Reviews research on the effectiveness of recasts in first and second language acquisition, paying particular attention to how recasts have been defined and how their impact has been assessed in observational and experimental studies. Concludes that recasts appear to be most effective in contexts where it is clear to the learner that the recast is…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback, Interlanguage, Language Acquisition
Guenette, Danielle – Journal of Second Language Writing, 2007
The debate continues between those who believe in giving corrective feedback to students to improve their written accuracy and those who do not. Indeed, the results of the many experimental studies on written corrective feedback carried out over the last 20 years have been so contradictory that second language teachers looking to support their…
Descriptors: Research Design, Language Teachers, Feedback, Error Correction
Peer reviewedSchulze, Mathias – CALICO Journal, 2003
Discusses selected theoretical aspects of providing error feedback for language learners. Theoretical considerations concerning the dialog with the learner about linguistic errors are discussed, and some conclusions for computer assisted language learning (CALL) system design are drawn. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Error Correction, Feedback, Grammar
Peer reviewedMings, Robert C. – Foreign Language Annals, 1993
This paper examines contemporary trends in the error correction literature. Emphases are on types of errors and methods of correction that affect second-language acquisition. (54 references) (JL)
Descriptors: Definitions, Error Correction, Feedback, Language Research
Peer reviewedEskenazi, Maxine – Language Learning & Technology, 1999
Discusses the possible use of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for training students to improve their accents in a foreign language. Principles of good language training as well as the limits of the use of ASR and how to deal with them are discussed, and an example from the Carnegie Mellon FLUENCY system is used to show how such a system may…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback, Higher Education, Language Processing
Ancker, William – Forum, 2000
Reports on a study that examined whether teachers' expectations toward error correction differed from students' expectations. Data has been gathered over 4 years from teachers, teacher trainees, and students in 15 countries. Specially, participants were asked to answer yes or no to the following question: Should teachers correct every mistake…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback, Language Teachers, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedSchulz, Renate A. – Foreign Language Annals, 1996
Reports on an exploratory study that examined and compared foreign-language student and teacher beliefs regarding the benefit of a focus on form in language learning. Results showed that students are relatively favorable toward a focus on form; however, surprising discrepancies surfaced in teacher beliefs and in a comparison of student and teacher…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error Correction, Feedback, Grammar
Peer reviewedCowan, Ron; Choi, Hyun Eun; Kim, Doe Hyung – CALICO Journal, 2003
Poses four important questions relevant to error diagnosis and correction in computer assisted language learning (CALL). These questions relate to the diagnosis of persistent second language (L2) learner grammar errors, whether these can be corrected, what types of feedback from the computer are most efficient for focusing the students' attention…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software Evaluation, Error Correction, Feedback
Peer reviewedWhite, Lydia; And Others – Applied Linguistics, 1991
Investigated the extent to which form-focused instruction and corrective feedback (i.e., "input enhancement"), provided within a primarily communicative program, contribute to learners' accuracy in question formation. Study results are interpreted as evidence that input enhancement can bring about genuine changes in learners' interlanguage…
Descriptors: English, English (Second Language), Error Correction, Feedback

Direct link
