Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 21 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 65 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 164 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 386 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 28 |
| Practitioners | 24 |
| Teachers | 9 |
| Administrators | 4 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Counselors | 3 |
| Policymakers | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 13 |
| Canada | 11 |
| California | 10 |
| Australia | 9 |
| Florida | 8 |
| China | 7 |
| Sweden | 7 |
| United States | 7 |
| Israel | 6 |
| Netherlands | 6 |
| Norway | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcLoughlin, Caven S.; Gullo, Dominic F. – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1984
Three standardized language assessment measures (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, Test of Early Language Development, and the Preschool Language Scale) were individually administered to 25 nonreferred, White, middle-class preschoolers. Correlations among the three measures were statistically significant suggesting an interrelationship of…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Language Handicaps, Language Tests, Preschool Education
Peer reviewedWilson, Barry J.; Reichmuth, Sr. Monica – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1985
Several criteria are proposed for determining and communicating screening results. These criteria provide a context for judging prediction accuracy. It is argued that accuracy of prediction is of little value and cannot be considered sufficient unless the predictions lead to better educational opportunities for the students about whom they are…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education, High Risk Persons
Peer reviewedSchetz, Katherine F. – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1985
Comparison revealed that the percentage of Ss identified differed between the two tests for articulation, vocabulary, language, comprehension, and language expression; higher than normal percentages of speech deficits were identified on both tests; and the same individuals were not always identified for diagnostic testing. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Comprehension, Disability Identification, Language Handicaps
Peer reviewedHarrington, Robert G. – School Psychology Review, 1984
Traditionally, the contributions of school psychologists during the screening phase of preschool assessment have been minimal. The purpose of this article is to broaden the school psychologist's perspective regarding preschool screening and in the process introduce some specific screening activities which closely parallel the school psychologist's…
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Disability Identification, Preschool Education, Preschool Tests
Peer reviewedVolger, George P.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1984
Self-reported reading ability of parents of 174 reading-disabled children and of 182 controls was used to estimate the probability that a child will become reading disabled. Using Bayesian inverse probability analysis, it was found that the risk for reading disability is increased substantially if either parent has had difficulty in learning to…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Family Characteristics, High Risk Persons, Parents
Peer reviewedMadison, Lynda Sallach; Adubato, Susan A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1983
Tested the effectiveness of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Test and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development in assessing the development of 30 preschool children. Demonstrated that encountering children ages 18-23 months whose performance is not scorable by standard methods for either test is a relatively frequent occurrence. (JAC)
Descriptors: Child Development, Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedMattison, Richard E.; And Others – Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1982
A screening method for distinguishing speech and language disordered children (2 to 15 years old) with and without psychiatric disorders (N=256) involved cutoff scores for an easily administered parent and teacher behavior rating questionnaire. (CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Communication Disorders, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedWiig, Elisabeth H.; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1982
Study evaluated sensitivity of two independent rapid naming tests--Naming Pictured Objects and Producing Names on Confrontation--in differentiating 16 children (7 and 8 years old) with language and learning disabilities from 16 age peers with normal language development and academic achievement. The interrelationship between total naming time and…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Language Handicaps, Language Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedLevine, Melvin D.; And Others – Pediatrics, 1980
The Pediatric Examination of Educational Readiness, a standardized observation system which combines a prekindergarten physical examination with a neurodevelopmental and behavioral assessment, was field tested on 386 children, of whom 22 percent revealed a "definite concern" in one area of development or behavior, 8 percent in two, and…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Learning Readiness, Medical Evaluation
Peer reviewedLindsay, G. A. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980
A study was made of the usefulness of the Infant Rating Scale (IRS) in the early identification of learning difficulties. Thirteen hundred five-year-olds were rated by their teachers after one term in school. The structure of the IRS, its reliability, and predictive validity are examined. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Learning Problems, Predictive Validity, Preschool Education
Peer reviewedRatusnik, David L.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1980
A shortened form of the Northwestern Syntax Screening Test (NSST)--used to identify language impaired children--was developed and cross-validated with the original test. The shortened version, taking approximately 10 minutes to administer, was normed in six-month intervals, as opposed to the one-year intervals of the original NSST. (Author/DLS)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education, Language Handicaps, Screening Tests
Peer reviewedGlattke, Theodore J.; And Others – American Journal of Audiology, 1995
Measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) reproducibility were obtained for 506 ears of 260 children and young adults. Findings suggest that TEOAEs provide useful information in routine clinical practice and may be employed to screen for the presence of hearing loss in children and young adults. (DB)
Descriptors: Audiology, Auditory Evaluation, Children, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewedMadaus, Joseph W. – Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1998
Presents an overview of a screening process developed by a postsecondary institution that has a comprehensive support program for students with learning disabilities. The steps in the process are outlined, as are the successes and limitations. Recommendations for programs that are considering adopting a screening process are provided. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: College Students, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedPolson, Cheryl J.; White, Warren J. – Adult Basic Education, 2000
Adult basic education providers in 9 states (n=555) identified barriers to providing accommodations for students with disabilities: inadequate number of agencies for assessment referrals, lack of training, inappropriate instructional materials, ineffective assessment tools, and limited budget/staff. The lack of screening and interventions for…
Descriptors: Academic Persistence, Accessibility (for Disabled), Adult Education, Adult Students
Peer reviewedMcDaniel, William F.; Foster, Robert A.; Compton, David M.; Courtney, Audrey S. – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1998
A protocol for screening the complex verbal, simple verbal, simple visual, and spatial working memory was tested on 125 persons with mild, moderate, and severe mental retardation. Results found the test discriminated well between levels of mental retardation, correlated reasonably well with IQ, and possessed relatively good test-retest…
Descriptors: Adults, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Intelligence Differences


