Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Predictive Validity | 2 |
| Screening Tests | 2 |
| Admission Criteria | 1 |
| Awards | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Admission | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Conference Reports | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Bakke v Regents of University… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGottfredson, Stephen D.; Gottfredson, Don M. – Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1980
Compares, within the context of parole decision making, the predictive utility of five statistical methods commonly used to develop correctional risk-screening devices. Results suggest that no apparent empirical advantage accrues to any particular model. Further, most devices developed are highly intercorrelated. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criminals, Decision Making, Models
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. – 1978
At the 1977 Educational Testing Service (ETS) Invitational Conference, the ETS Measurement Award was presented to Anne Anastasi. In view of the convergence of measurement and the law, the conference focused on six related issues. Barbara Lerner explored the screening procedures of American professional and graduate schools in "Equal…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Awards, Cheating, College Admission


