Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Creative Thinking | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Creative Activities | 1 |
| Creativity | 1 |
| Creativity Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Creativity Research Journal | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPlucker, Jonathan A.; Qian, Meihua; Schmalensee, Stephanie L. – Creativity Research Journal, 2014
In recent years, the social sciences have seen a resurgence in the study of divergent thinking (DT) measures. However, many of these recent advances have focused on abstract, decontextualized DT tasks (e.g., list as many things as you can think of that have wheels). This study provides a new perspective by exploring the reliability and validity…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Scoring Formulas, Evaluation Methods
Runco, Mark A.; Acar, Selcuk – Creativity Research Journal, 2012
Divergent thinking (DT) tests are very often used in creativity studies. Certainly DT does not guarantee actual creative achievement, but tests of DT are reliable and reasonably valid predictors of certain performance criteria. The validity of DT is described as reasonable because validity is not an all-or-nothing attribute, but is, instead, a…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creative Activities, Creative Thinking, Test Validity
