Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Reliability | 3 |
| Scoring | 3 |
| Scoring Formulas | 3 |
| Generalizability Theory | 2 |
| Childrens Writing | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cetin, Bayram | 1 |
| Daniel, Cathy | 1 |
| Dellinger, Amy | 1 |
| Denny, R. Kenton | 1 |
| Essex, Diane L. | 1 |
| Guler, Nese | 1 |
| Powers, Taylor | 1 |
| Sarica, Rabia | 1 |
| Stuhlmann, Janice | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cetin, Bayram; Guler, Nese; Sarica, Rabia – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2016
Problem Statement: In addition to being teaching tools, concept maps can be used as effective assessment tools. The use of concept maps for assessment has raised the issue of scoring them. Concept maps generated and used in different ways can be scored via various methods. Holistic and relational scoring methods are two of them. Purpose of the…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Concept Mapping, Scoring, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedEssex, Diane L. – Journal of Medical Education, 1976
Two multiple-choice scoring schemes--a partial credit scheme and a dichotomous approach--were compared analyzing means, variances, and reliabilities on alternate measures and student reactions. Students preferred the partial-credit approach, which is recommended if rewarding for partial knowledge is an important concern. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Medical Students, Multiple Choice Tests, Reliability
Peer reviewedStuhlmann, Janice; Daniel, Cathy; Dellinger, Amy; Denny, R. Kenton; Powers, Taylor – Reading Psychology, 1999
Investigates whether training raters to interpret the scoring dimensions on a rubric would increase reliability. Compares two groups of kindergarten and first-grade teachers: one group with training, one without. Finds that training increases raters' abilities to reliably interpret scoring items. (SC)
Descriptors: Childrens Writing, Comparative Analysis, Generalizability Theory, Grade 1


