Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Discussion (Teaching… | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| Graphs | 1 |
| Introductory Courses | 1 |
| Peer Teaching | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cooper, Scott | 1 |
| Downey, Nicholas | 1 |
| Galbraith, Anne | 1 |
| Jeanne, Robert | 1 |
| Perez, Kathryn E. | 1 |
| Strauss, Eric A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPerez, Kathryn E.; Strauss, Eric A.; Downey, Nicholas; Galbraith, Anne; Jeanne, Robert; Cooper, Scott – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2010
The use of personal response systems, or clickers, is increasingly common in college classrooms. Although clickers can increase student engagement and discussion, their benefits also can be overstated. A common practice is to ask the class a question, display the responses, allow the students to discuss the question, and then collect the responses…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Biology, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Peer Teaching
