Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 5 |
| Cognitive Structures | 5 |
| Science Education | 5 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| College Science | 2 |
| Interviews | 2 |
| Botany | 1 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| Class Activities | 1 |
| Cluster Analysis | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Clark, Douglas B. | 1 |
| Michel Bélanger | 1 |
| Sampson, Victor | 1 |
| Stains, Marilyne | 1 |
| Talanquer, Vicente | 1 |
| Tull, Delena | 1 |
| Veldhuis, G. Henry | 1 |
| Vincent Richard | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Michel Bélanger; Vincent Richard – Science & Education, 2025
Various studies in science education have concluded that successful science learning sometimes consists in students having two or more incompatible representations regarding a phenomenon. Specifically, a pluralist perspective acknowledges that such representational plurality is normal and even beneficial for the individual. Our working hypothesis…
Descriptors: Science Education, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Structures, Classification
Stains, Marilyne; Talanquer, Vicente – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008
In this study we explore the strategies that undergraduate and graduate chemistry students use when engaged in classification tasks involving symbolic and microscopic (particulate) representations of different chemical reactions. We were specifically interested in characterizing the basic features to which students pay attention when classifying…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Graduate Students, Chemistry, Classification
Sampson, Victor; Clark, Douglas B. – Science Education, 2008
Theoretical and empirical research on argument and argumentation in science education has intensified over the last two decades. The term argument in this review refers to the artifacts that a student or a group of students create when asked to articulate and justify claims or explanations whereas the term argumentation refers to the process of…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Science Education, Student Experience, Scientific and Technical Information
Peer reviewedVeldhuis, G. Henry – Science Education, 1990
The nature of cluster analysis and dendograms, subjects, tasks, and results of this study are described. Categories for problems were based on assumptions about the methods used by novice and expert problem solvers in a physics context. (CW)
Descriptors: Classification, Cluster Analysis, Cognitive Structures, College Science
Tull, Delena – 1992
The assertion that there is a social component to children's construction of knowledge about natural phenomena is supported by evidence from an examination of children's classification schemes for plants. An ethnographic study was conducted with nine sixth grade children in central Texas. The children classified plants in the outdoors, in a…
Descriptors: Botany, Class Activities, Classification, Cognitive Structures

Direct link
