Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Freedom | 5 |
| Creationism | 5 |
| Evolution | 5 |
| Science Curriculum | 5 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Controversial Issues (Course… | 3 |
| Religious Factors | 3 |
| State Church Separation | 3 |
| Censorship | 1 |
| Community Influence | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Academe | 1 |
| NASSP Bulletin | 1 |
| Online Submission | 1 |
| Science, Technology, & Human… | 1 |
| Texas Tech Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hoodman, Kyle Nathan – Online Submission, 2010
This study investigates how evolution versus intelligent design is handled in the public, private Christian, private Jewish, and Christian Home-school K-12 settings through a review of the current literature and by interviewing teachers in these educational venues. Fourteen public, private, and homeschool educators responded to an interview…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Evolution, Creationism, Private Schools
Peer reviewedO'Neil, Robert M. – Academe, 1982
The legal tests that are applied to the issue of state mandates to provide creation instruction in public schools, and the implications of the mandates, are discussed. This issue is compared with other curriculum mandates and requirements to illustrate the difficulty of the problem. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Constitutional Law, Creationism, Evolution
Skoog, Gerald – Texas Tech Journal of Education, 1983
Legal decisions and other arguments support the argument that the exclusion of creationism from school curricula is not the result of censorship or bias. Equal-time legislation for creationism has the potential to entangle the state and religion and to make the task of teachers, textbook authors, and publishers nearly impossible. (PP)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedBleifeld, Maurice – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
Discusses the nature of the movement to include scientific creationism in the school curriculum and science textbooks, explains the extent of scientists' acceptance of evolution, and describes actions being taken to counteract creationist efforts in an organized and effective manner. (PGD)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Community Influence, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism
Peer reviewedSturm, Susan P. – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Argues that the fight against creationism in public schools is essential to the preservation of First Amendment rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Discusses how creationists, to avoid religious issues, are presenting the "creation-science" (pseudoscience) issue in terms of academic freedom and censorship. (Author/JN)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Censorship, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism


