Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Generalization | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 2 |
| Sample Size | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Hearing (Physiology) | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Psycholinguistics | 1 |
| Speech Language Pathology | 1 |
Author
| Barr, Dale J. | 1 |
| Daryush D. Mehta | 1 |
| Hamzeh Ghasemzadeh | 1 |
| Levy, Roger | 1 |
| Robert E. Hillman | 1 |
| Scheepers, Christoph | 1 |
| Tily, Harry J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hamzeh Ghasemzadeh; Robert E. Hillman; Daryush D. Mehta – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2024
Purpose: Many studies using machine learning (ML) in speech, language, and hearing sciences rely upon cross-validations with single data splitting. This study's first purpose is to provide quantitative evidence that would incentivize researchers to instead use the more robust data splitting method of nested k-fold cross-validation. The second…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Speech Language Pathology, Statistical Analysis, Models
Barr, Dale J.; Levy, Roger; Scheepers, Christoph; Tily, Harry J. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2013
Linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs) have become increasingly prominent in psycholinguistics and related areas. However, many researchers do not seem to appreciate how random effects structures affect the generalizability of an analysis. Here, we argue that researchers using LMEMs for confirmatory hypothesis testing should minimally adhere to the…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Psycholinguistics, Models, Monte Carlo Methods

Peer reviewed
Direct link
